Unplug it would be great but it's wireless. Smash it etc would be fun as
well if I knew who it belonged to and where it was. The traffic isn't a
huge deal... But it does skew our reports a LOT. :) I'll try the false clan
method! Thanks all!
On Aug 22, 2014 10:14 PM, "Durand fabrice" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Le 2014-08-22 22:52, Sallee, Jake a écrit :
>
>  Unplug it?  :)
>
>
> That is perfect!  Simple, elegant, and fool proof!  Other methods known to 
> work are:
>
> 1) Hard blows with a hammer
> 2) Going for a 60 second spin in the microwave (careful it may charge the 
> batteries : )
> 3) A quick dip in the pool
>
> And my personal favorite:
>
> .5 lbs of black powder (.22 kg for our metric friends) and some cannon fuse. 
> Light the fuse and let the fun commence.
>
> As an alternative, if you are in vlan enforcement mode, you can create a new 
> category (I used DENYACCESS) and give it a vlan id that does not exist on 
> your network. I used vlan 86 (as in 86'em).  then assign that device to the 
> gategory.
>
>  One of my favorite vlan id i have seen in this case is 666 }:-)
>
>
> You can also set up a violation to do something very similar.
>
> Both solutions stop the MAC from getting on the network at all.
>
> Jake Sallee
> Godfather of Bandwidth
> System Engineer
> University of Mary Hardin-BaylorWWW.UMHB.EDU
>
> 900 College St.
> Belton, Texas
> 76513
>
> Fone: 254-295-4658
> Phax: 254-295-4221
> ________________________________
> From: Tim DeNike [[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 7:58 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Unusual DHCP Traffic Levels
>
>
> Unplug it?  :)
>
> So it's just generating traffic to the registration portal?  Does the traffic 
> really matter?
>
> On Aug 22, 2014 8:35 PM, "Brian Lucas" 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>> wrote:
> There is an unregistered device with a Nintendo 3DS signature that is 
> constantly and repeatedly getting put into our registration vlan, 
> disconnecting, and repeating the process.  It has generated 1.09 TB of 
> traffic on the network in the last month, or about 50% of our traffic.  As 
> you can imagine this skews our reports a bit.  Is there anyway to make it 
> stop?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Slashdot TV.
> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.http://tv.slashdot.org/
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing 
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>  
> <[email protected]>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Slashdot TV.
> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.http://tv.slashdot.org/
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing 
> [email protected]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Slashdot TV.
> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
> http://tv.slashdot.org/
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.  
Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to