Hi,

I had a setup with 802.1x  and ldap auth sources with ldap-based rules 
for vlan selection. It used to work quite well, but after 4.3 and now 
4.4 upgrade, internal auth rules never get evaluated by 
httpd.webservices when an user connects.
Note that radius 802.1x ldap auth works perfectly. But then there are no 
source matching, and the role is always the node's one.

The only changes made in my conf were to suppress custom.pm and replace 
it with vlan_filters for 802.1x autoregistration

See log :

Sep 26 18:06:19 httpd.webservices(23455) INFO: [44:74:6c:50:25:e7] 
handling radius autz request: from switch_ip => (172.16.1.136), 
connection_type => Wireless-802.11-EAP,switch_mac => 
(00:60:b3:d0:96:fa), mac => [44:74:6c:50:25:e7], port => 1, username => 
"denis.bonnenfant" (pf::radius::authorize)
Sep 26 18:06:19 httpd.webservices(23455) INFO: [44:74:6c:50:25:e7] 
Username was NOT defined or unable to match a role - returning node 
based role 'mobiles_profs' (pf::vlan::getNormalVlan)
Sep 26 18:06:19 httpd.webservices(23455) INFO: [44:74:6c:50:25:e7] PID: 
"denis.bonnenfant", Status: reg. Returned VLAN: 150 
(pf::vlan::fetchVlanForNode)
Sep 26 18:06:19 httpd.webservices(23455) INFO: [44:74:6c:50:25:e7] 
(172.16.1.136) Returning ACCEPT with VLAN 150 and role 
(pf::Switch::returnRadiusAccessAccept)

Did i missed something during upgrade (debian packages)? Is there a way 
to increase verbosity for debugging purposes ?


Thanks,

denis Bonnenfant

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to