Hi,

We acheived to setup 802.1x+MAB on HP 2610 HP switches just like with 
Cisco. As this is nearly undocumented, I want to share the information, 
as it may  be interesting to have it on official PF devices config guide.

The trick is to use  aaa port-access authenticator x client-limit 1, 
which allows multiple auth modes for a single client. With this setup, 
802.1x auth is tried first, and if it fails, mac auth is performed.

radius-server host a.b.c.d acct-port 1813 key "verysecret"
snmp-server host a.b.c.d community "public" informs trap-level not-info
no snmp-server enable traps link-change x
aaa server-group radius "packetfence" host a.b.c.d
aaa authentication port-access eap-radius server-group "packetfence"
aaa authentication mac-based chap-radius server-group "packetfence"
port-security x learn-mode port-access action send-alarm
aaa port-access authenticator x
aaa port-access authenticator x client-limit 1
aaa port-access authenticator active
aaa port-access mac-based x
aaa port-access mac-based x addr-moves
aaa port-access mac-based x reauth-period 14400
aaa port-access x controlled-direction in

The last line is supposed to allow WOL magic packets to be sent to the 
port. Unfortunately it doesn't seems to work, I have to investigate this 
issue, as I'm not sure that Magic packets are reaching the switch if 
there is no untagged vlan matching WOL broadcast address configured on it.

Regards,

Denis Bonnenfant
Lycée Diderot Paris

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to