Hi Adrian,
On Mar 4, 2015, at 14:43 , Calugaru Adrian <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Louis
>
> I've managed to make the radius proxy working but now if the PC is not
> authenticated the PF doesn't react.
> Is there something I'm missing ?
That’s as it should be.
If a user does not authenticate, then PacketFence does not have anything to do.
802.1x is for users that can authenticate and to which you want to apply
additional authorization rules (specific VLANS etc.)
Or do you mean there is no radius request coming from the switch (or controller
as may be)?
>
> Could you please let me know which is the recommended procedure ?
>
Please explain what you are trying to achieve.
Perhaps 802.1x is not the right solution for you.
Also please post the output of
# radiusd -d /usr/local/pf/raddb -X
When trying to authenticate.
Regards,
--
Louis Munro
[email protected] :: www.inverse.ca
+1.514.447.4918 x125 :: +1 (866) 353-6153 x125
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
(www.packetfence.org)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
