I am currently resetup PF and I would just like to know whether this is
possible or not, since this is the basics steps to do first ... !
Sorry for uping.
Thanks.
2015-04-16 20:47 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Gailly <[email protected]>:
> Hello,
>
> One thing we would like to achieve is the most possible separation between
> packetfence and the "users".
> The regular setup of packetfence suggets that we set up an interface eth0
> being the management interface, with isolation & registration VLAN built on
> top of eth0. Eth0 being connected to the switch with a trunk connection.
> Does the admin portal must necessarily have the same IP address as the
> management interface ?
> Would it be possible to set up the trunk connection on eth0,that would
> become the management interface,
> and let's say, have the admin / configuration portal setup on another IP
> address (i.e. interface) in another part of the network ?
> So users shouldn't be able to access the admin page depending on their
> VLAN / setup / rights.
> Like seeing the admin portal as a "service" in the network, and as such,
> should not be coupled with an "access" switch directly.
>
> I've checked the httpd.admin conf file but the "$vhost" variable is
> generated dynamically , I think from the packetfence conf, so it doesn't
> look possible but I don't know that much about the internals of PF.
>
> Thank you, I hope I've been clear enough .. !
>
> Nicolas GAILLY
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
