If you don't want to create vlan on packetfence side then you must have
an interface for each vlans.

per example:
eth0 (mgmt, pf side) <-> switch port vlan access 1
eth1 (reg, pf side)  <-> switch port vlan access 20
eth2 (isol, pf side) <-> switch port vlan access 30
...


Regards
Fabrice
 

Le 2015-04-20 09:06, Tal Bar-Or a écrit :
> Thanks Fabrice for the answer, :-)
>
> As for vlan config , how should i set the vlans , in case i want to
> leave ports in actual config "Untagged" and still have control of them
> , and what else should i set with Packetfence and on the switch side
>
> Cheers
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Fabrice DURAND <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Tal,
>
>     Le 2015-04-19 14:29, Tal Bar-Or a écrit :
>     >
>     > Hello All,
>     >
>     > I am in the process of validating PacketFence and few other product
>     > like MS NPS,OpenNac
>     >
>     > Whats i am interested at most is three scenarios that can do
>     isolation
>     > to designated VLAN  but i am not yet ready to turn all our users
>     > switch port to dot1x authentication right away , since i have
>     mass  of
>     > equipment and each switch have some users on each 4 users Vlan
>     we got
>     > as Unttaged , at the first step as follows below , mostly interested
>     > with virus detection and isolation for existing static ports
>     > configured as untagged.
>     >
>     > First scenario : We have Symantec endpoint protection AV and we
>     would
>     > like to have isolation in case of
>     >
>     >   * client infection
>     >   * AV not installed
>     >
>     Let's configure packetfence with Symantec endoint :
>     
> http://inverse.ca/downloads/PacketFence/doc/PacketFence_SEPM_Quick_Install_Guide-5.0.0.pdf
>
>     > Second scenario: Our organization firewalls(Pfsesnce) have ids Snort
>     > based capable of sending syslog alert ,unified, SQL log alert, we
>     > would like to have   ability to inform some how Packetfence server
>     > with violating IP and have it VLAN isolated , again first step most
>     > users still have static port Untagged .
>     >
>     We have a pfdetect remote that send the snort/suricata event to
>     packetfence.
>     >
>     > Third Scenario: unknown device attached to socket wall conf room or
>     > somewhere else, for those ports only we would like to use dot1x
>     > authentication will be isolated .
>     >
>     if the username and password is wrong then they will never be able to
>     connect.
>
>     > Another point is that Most of network equipment are based on HP
>     > Procurve 2910al ,2920 ,1900
>     >
>     perfect
>     >
>     > My question to you PacketFence experts is possible with given above
>     > scenarios?
>     >
>     > Please advice
>     >
>     > Thanks
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > --
>     > Tal Bar-or
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     > BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
>     > Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
>     > Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through
>     live exercises
>     > http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual-
>     event?utm_
>     >
>     source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
>     >
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > PacketFence-users mailing list
>     > [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
>     Regards
>     Fabrice
>
>     --
>     Fabrice Durand
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ::  +1.514.447.4918
>     <tel:%2B1.514.447.4918> (x135) ::  www.inverse.ca
>     <http://www.inverse.ca>
>     Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and
>     PacketFence (http://packetfence.org)
>
>
>     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
>     Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
>     Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live
>     exercises
>     http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual-
>     event?utm_
>     source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
>     _______________________________________________
>     PacketFence-users mailing list
>     [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Tal Bar-or
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
> Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
> Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
> http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
> source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


-- 
Fabrice Durand
[email protected] ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://packetfence.org) 

Attachment: 0xF78F957E.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to