See the incoming message about 5.3.1. You caught us in the middle of an update to the repository.
What you are seeing is a known issue. It was present in 5.3 too. WebAuth breaks the preview. We’ll look into a fix for this in 5.4. In the meantime your portal should still work. Only the preview is affected. -- Louis Munro [email protected] :: www.inverse.ca +1.514.447.4918 x125 :: +1 (866) 353-6153 x125 Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) On Jul 24, 2015, at 13:02 , Alvaro Luiz Maia Motta <[email protected]> wrote: > Folks, greetings. > > > The first time we installed packetfence, was on the day version 5.3 was > released. > > On the very first time we installed, we did a few configurations (WebAuth) > and were able to preview the captive portal by clicking on the preview button > in the Portal Profiles page. As it looked nice, we decided that the package > was what we were looking for. > > Today, we did a fresh install and now the preview button gives us a Bad > Request page > (URL=https://192.168.234.50:1443/portal_preview/?PORTAL=default). We could > not find a way (cleaning cookies and flushing DNS entries)to fix the error. > > By checking the CentOS repository > (http://www.packetfence.org/downloads/PacketFence/CentOS6/x86_64/RPMS/), we > saw that none of the files have the date 21-Jul-2015. Most of them have > today's date. > > Anybody experiencing the same? > > > Thanks in advance. > > > Regards, > > AL > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > PacketFence-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
