Good point. Try defining that to one of either all or any. Since there is only one condition it should not matter which you choose.
Regards, -- Louis Munro [email protected] :: www.inverse.ca +1.514.447.4918 x125 :: +1 (866) 353-6153 x125 Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) On Sep 29, 2015, at 14:21 , Arthur Emerson <[email protected]> wrote: > Stupid questions. Our PF 4.x install (configured by GUI) seems to only > use "match=all" for catch-all rules. Where conditions are specified, > it has "match=any". Does the domain_admin rule above need "match=any" > or is it optional with only one condition configured? Is "match=all" > with no conditions making the domain_users rule into a catch-all? > Just curious, since I have never really worked with the config files > in PF 4.x.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
