Thanks Derek! I will dig into this and let you know where I land.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 2:38 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: PacketFence-users Digest, Vol 90, Issue 37
Send PacketFence-users mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re:
Contents of PacketFence-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Send remote Suricata sensor alerts to PacketFence via
syslog (Derek Wuelfrath)
2. Re: PacketFence-users Digest, Vol 90, Issue 36 (Boley, Chris)
3. Re: tweaking the create users page (Derek Wuelfrath)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:08:07 -0400
From: Derek Wuelfrath <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Send remote Suricata sensor alerts to
PacketFence via syslog
To: ML PF <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hello Chris,
Sorry, I replied to your first message.
I did exactly what you are looking for, but, using syslog-ng on the remote
sensor.
- You first need to configure Suricata to log to syslog (i think it is the
default behavior)
- You then need to configure syslog-ng to send a copy of the Suricata log to
the PacketFence management IP address
filter f_suricata { match('suricata:' value("MSGHDR")); };
destination d_suricata { tcp(?PACKETFENCE_MANAGEMENT_IP"); };
log { source(s_syslog); filter(f_suricata); destination(d_suricata); };
- You need to allow tcp port 514 on the PacketFence firewall (edit the
/usr/local/pf/conf/iptables.conf file should be enough)
- Make rsyslog (running on the PacketFence server) to listen for remote syslog
messages
Uncomment "$ModLoad imtcp" and "$InputTCPServerRun 514" in /etc/rsyslog.conf
- Make sure alert pipe file exists (/usr/local/pf/var/alert)
mkfifo /usr/local/pf/var/alert
- Configure rsyslog to log remote Suricata log in alert pipe
:programname, isequal, "suricata" |/usr/local/pf/var/alert
- Configure trapping on PacketFence
trapping.detection = enabled
services.snort = disabled
services.suricata = disabled
- Remove the following check from pfcmd checkup
https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/blob/devel/lib/pf/pfcmd/checkup.pm#L298
Comment lines 298 to 303
- Adapt pfdetect regex.
https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/blob/devel/sbin/pfdetect#L103
Comment lines 103 to 131
Add the following after 131
if ( $_ =~
/^(.+?\s\d+\s\d+:\d+:\d+)\s+.+?\[\d+:(\d+):\d+\]\s+(.+?)\s+\[.+?\s+(.+?)\].+?\}\s+(.+?):.+?>\s(.+?):/
) {
$date = $1;
$sid = $2;
$descr = $3;
$srcip = $5;
$dstip = $6;
} else {
$logger->warn("unknown input: $_ ");
next;
}
Restart both packetfence and rsyslog
Let me know how it goes.
Cheers!
dw.
?
Derek Wuelfrath
[email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: +1.866.353.6153 (x110)
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
(www.packetfence.org)
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 8:55 AM, Boley, Chris <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I'm looking for the correct information to send syslog based alert data from
> a remote Suricata sensor to Packet fence.
> I'm unsure of how to make PacketFence know that it will be getting alerts via
> syslog .
> I've tried to find the appropriate documentation regarding this, however it
> seems a bit hard to locate.
> Can anyone point me in the correct direction?
>
> So far I think I would need to change suricata.yaml to reflect the following
> items (I'd be grateful for any advice there):
>
> # a line based alerts log similar to fast.log into syslog
> - syslog:
> enabled: yes
> identity: "suricata"
> facility: local5
> level: Alert
>
> # Define your logging outputs. If none are defined, or they are all
> # disabled you will get the default - console output.
> outputs:
> - console:
> enabled: no
> - file:
> enabled: yes
> filename: /var/log/suricata.log
> - syslog:
> enabled: yes
> facility: local5
> format: "[%i] <%d> -- "
>
> I'm using vanilla syslogd on FreeBSD as my syslog on the sensor.
> I realize I will have to make some changes to its config to forward the
> alerts to the PacketFence server.
> I'm not even sure if the syslog format that will be input from suricata to
> syslogd will be compatible.
> I might have to manipulate it with a template in the conf file.
>
>
> I'm happy to do the reading.
> I've googled and googled and found not much of any meaningful info where this
> topic is concerned.
> I was hoping someone might know of some useful documentation on how to
> manipulate PacketFence and get it to start acting on Suricata alerts...
>
>
> Chris Boley | Network Engineer | Cogentrix Energy Power Management,
> LLC
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------- _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:57:54 +0000
From: "Boley, Chris" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] PacketFence-users Digest, Vol 90,
Issue 36
To: "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Derek, yes it's a separate unit. FreeBSD 10.2 with Suricata running on it. No
special suite of softwares. It's just the Suricata install.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 10:53 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: PacketFence-users Digest, Vol 90, Issue 36
Send PacketFence-users mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re:
Contents of PacketFence-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Suricata alerts to Packet Fence (Derek Wuelfrath)
2. Re: pfdhcplistener (Derek Wuelfrath)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:41:05 -0400
From: Derek Wuelfrath <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Suricata alerts to Packet Fence
To: ML PF <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hello Chris,
Are you running Suricata on a separate box (I assume). Are you running it
standalone or withing a security suite (SecurityOnion per example).
Let me know
Cheers!
dw.
?
Derek Wuelfrath
[email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: +1.866.353.6153 (x110)
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
(www.packetfence.org)
> On Oct 9, 2015, at 5:05 PM, Boley, Chris <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Does anyone happen to know where I can find info on sending suricata alert
> events over to Packet Fence?
>
>
> Chris Boley | Network Engineer | Cogentrix Energy Power Management,
> LLC
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------- _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:52:22 -0400
From: Derek Wuelfrath <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] pfdhcplistener
To: ML PF <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hello Chinmay,
I?m looking at it and I?ll get back to you.
Cheers!
dw.
?
Derek Wuelfrath
[email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: +1.866.353.6153 (x110)
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
(www.packetfence.org)
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 2:17 AM, Chinmay Mahata <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Dear Derek,
> Any thought on my issue.....
>
> Regards,
> --Chinmay
>
>
>
> From: "Chinmay Mahata" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 18:13:36
> To: "[email protected]"
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] pfdhcplistener Dear Derek,
> Thanks for your quick response. I think I could not describe my
> problem/query properly.
>
> DHCPD is running on only one interface (eth0) of my PF server, no issue with
> that.
>
> Actually at the WAN side (upstream) of my PF server there is another DHCP
> server is running (though PF server WAN has static IP). Since pfdhcplistener
> is running at eth1(WAN) also, in the node (web)page I can see many
> unregistered nodes of WAN network which I don't want.
>
> I want to see only those nodes in the webpage which are under PF server
> and who are getting IP addresses from DHCP server running in PF server (on
> eth0). Hope pfdhcplistener on eth0 only can catch those.
>
> So I want to run only one instance of pfdhcplistener on interface eth0
> (pfdhcplistener_eth0). Please let me know how can I do that.
>
> Thanks again Derek.
>
> Regards,
> --Chinmay
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Derek Wuelfrath <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 22:11:09
> To: ML PF <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] pfdhcplistener Chinmay,
>
>> The packetfence server is working as a DHCP server.
>> I see that two pfdhcplisteners are running: pfdhcplistener_eth0,
>> pfdhcplistener_eth1.
>>
>>
>> But I want to run only one pfdhcplistener viz. pfdhcplistener_eth0. Can it
>> be possible (or it may cause other problem)? Which config item do I need to
>> modify for that?
>
> ?pfdhcplistener?, as its name says, listen for dhcp packets.
> PacketFence starts a ?pfdhcplistener? daemon on each of the required network
> interfaces (in this case, management and inline).
>
> ?pfdhcplistener? is not acting as a DHCP server, dhcpd is. ?pfdhcplistener?
> is only listening to DHCP packet for MAC <-> IP association useful in
> PacketFence.
>
> If you do a
> ps uafx | grep dhcpd
> you should see the dhcpd daemon running with only eth0 as listening interface.
>
> Cheers!
> dw.
>
> ?
> Derek Wuelfrath
> [email protected] :: +1.514.447.491
> <x-msg://f5mail.rediff.com/cgi-bin/prored.cgi?red=http://1.514.447.491
> &isImage=0&BlockImage=0&rediffng=0&rogue=ba42cf6a7cd18481ec5520d40f020
> 7840b977b09>8 (x110) :: +1.866.353.615
> <x-msg://f5mail.rediff.com/cgi-bin/prored.cgi?red=http://1.866.353.615
> &isImage=0&BlockImage=0&rediffng=0&rogue=af879f62ee1a7599566197d6e2221
> d8167f40afc>3 (x110) Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu
> <http://www.sogo.nu/>) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org
> <http://www.packetfence.org/>)
>
>> On Oct 8, 2015, at 10:42 AM, Chinmay Mahata <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I have setup packetfence(5.4.0) with inline enforcement having below
>> interface details (LAN: eth0, WAN: eth1).
>>
>> [interface eth0]
>> enforcement=inlinel2
>> type=internal
>>
>> [interface eth1]
>> type=management
>>
>> The packetfence server is working as a DHCP server.
>> I see that two pfdhcplisteners are running: pfdhcplistener_eth0,
>> pfdhcplistener_eth1.
>>
>>
>> But I want to run only one pfdhcplistener viz. pfdhcplistener_eth0. Can it
>> be possible (or it may cause other problem)? Which config item do I need to
>> modify for that?
>>
>> Waiting for your help.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>> --Chinmay
>>
>>
>>
>> Get your own FREE website, FREE domain & FREE mobile app with Company email.
>> ?
>>
>> <https://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.
>> com/signatureline.htm@Middle?>Know More >
>> <http://track.rediff.com/click?url=___http://businessemail.rediff.com
>> ?sc_cid=sign-1-10-13___&cmp=host&lnk=sign-1-10-13&nsrv1=host>--------
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> - _______________________________________________
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>> <x-msg://f5mail.rediff.com/cgi-bin/prored.cgi?red=https%3A%2F%2Flists
>> .sourceforge.net%2Flists%2Flistinfo%2Fpacketfence-users&isImage=0&Blo
>> ckImage=0&rediffng=0&rogue=fed20659922918f122f7abeaae6537fdd08a0e78>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------- _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
> <x-msg://f5mail.rediff.com/cgi-bin/prored.cgi?red=https%3A%2F%2Flists.
> sourceforge.net%2Flists%2Flistinfo%2Fpacketfence-users&isImage=0&Block
> Image=0&rediffng=0&rogue=fed20659922918f122f7abeaae6537fdd08a0e78>
>
>
> Get your own FREE website, FREE domain & FREE mobile app with Company email. ?
>
> <https://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.c
> om/signatureline.htm@Middle?>Know More >
> <http://track.rediff.com/click?url=___http://businessemail.rediff.com?
> sc_cid=sign-1-10-13___&cmp=host&lnk=sign-1-10-13&nsrv1=host>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------- _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
>
> <https://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.c
> om/signatureline.htm@Middle?> Get your own FREE website, FREE domain &
> FREE mobile app with Company email.
> Know More >
> <http://track.rediff.com/click?url=___http://businessemail.rediff.com?
> sc_cid=sign-1-10-13___&cmp=host&lnk=sign-1-10-13&nsrv1=host>----------
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
End of PacketFence-users Digest, Vol 90, Issue 36
*************************************************
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:27:15 -0400
From: Derek Wuelfrath <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] tweaking the create users page
To: ML PF <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Andi,
What is the ?expiration? action type ?
Can you send me the whole file so I see what you are trying to do.
If you try to hide the ?registration window? section use the followings:
<input type=?hidden? name=?valid_from? value=?YYYY-MM-DD?> <input type=?hidden?
name=?expiration? value=?YYYY-MM-DD?>
For the ?actions? section, the followings:
<input type=?hidden? name=?actions.1.type? value=?MY FIRST ACTION?> <input
type=?hidden? name=?actions.1.value? value=?ACTION1 VALUE?>
<input type=?hidden? name=?actions.2.type? value=?MY SECOND ACTION?> <input
type=?hidden? name=?actions.2.value? value=?ACTION2 VALUE?>
Cheers!
dw.
?
Derek Wuelfrath
[email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: +1.866.353.6153 (x110)
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
(www.packetfence.org)
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 9:22 AM, Morris, Andi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Derek,
> That?s been a really big help and I?m nearly there. What is the format for
> the date field? I?ve tried the following, but I get errors:
>
> <input type="hidden" name="actions.3.type" value="expiration"> <input
> type="hidden" name="actions.3.value" value="2016-10-13 00:00">
>
> The errors I get when creating a user are:
> Error! Expiration field is required
> Error! ?expiration? is not a valid value
>
> The values for dates I?ve tried are:
> ?yyyy-mm-dd?
> ?yyyy/mm/dd?
> ?yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm?
> ?yyyy/mm/dd hh:mm?
>
> Cheers,
> Andi
>
>
> From: Derek Wuelfrath [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 08 October 2015 18:00
> To: ML PF <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] tweaking the create users page
>
> I?ll keep looking for ways to give the users a default unreg date.
>
> Here?s how I usually do it:
>
> <input type="hidden" name="actions.0.type"
> value="set_access_duration?> <input type="hidden"
> name="actions.0.value" value=?"> <input type="hidden"
> name="actions.1.type" value="set_role?> <input type="hidden"
> name="actions.1.value" value="Invite">
>
> Cheers!
> dw.
>
> ?
> Derek Wuelfrath
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ::
> +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: +1.866.353.6153 (x110) Inverse inc. ::
> Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu <http://www.sogo.nu/>) and
> PacketFence (www.packetfence.org <http://www.packetfence.org/>)
>
> On Oct 8, 2015, at 12:04 PM, Morris, Andi <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> Aha, I found the Actions array in /lib/pf/Authentication/constants.pm and
> changed the order. That means that the Actions now shows ?Set access
> duration? by default on the create screen, perfect.
>
> I?ll keep looking for ways to give the users a default unreg date.
>
> Cheers,
> Andi
>
> From: Morris, Andi [mailto:[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>]
> Sent: 08 October 2015 16:32
> To: [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] tweaking the create users page
>
> Thanks Derek,
> I can see how that would work for a simple field such as Name, but I can?t
> work it out for the unregistration date.
>
> 77 <div class="control-group">
> <> 78 <label class="control-label" for="valid_from">[% l('Registration
> Window') %]</label>
> <> 79 <div class="controls input-daterange datepicker">
> <> 80 [% form.field('valid_from').render_element | none %] <i
> class="icon-arrow-right"></i>
> <> 81 [% form.field('expiration').render_element | none %]
> <> 82 </div>
> <> 83 </div>
>
>
> I still need to swap access duration for the set role action too.
>
> 85 <div class="control-group">
> <> 86 <label class="control-label">[% l('Actions') %]</label>
> <> 87 <div class="controls">
> <> 88 <table id="ruleActions" class="table table-dynamic
> table-sortable table-condensed">
> <> 89 <tbody>
> <> 90 [% FOREACH action IN form.field('actions').fields -%]
> <> 91 <tr[% ' class="hidden"' IF loop.last %]>
> <> 92 <td class="sort-handle">
> <> 93 <span>[% IF loop.last %]1[% ELSE %][% loop.index + 1
> %][% END %]</span>
> <> 94 </td>
> <> 95 <td>
> <> 96 [% action.field('type').render_element | none %]
> <> 97 [% action.field('value').render_element | none %]
> <> 98 </td>
> <> 99 <td class="action">
> <> 100 <a class="btn-icon" href="#add"><i
> class="icon-plus-sign"></i></a>
> <> 101 <a class="btn-icon[% ' hidden' IF loop.size == 2 %]"
> href="#delete"><i class="icon-minus-sign"></i></a>
> <> 102 </td>
> <> 103 </tr>
> <> 104 [% END -%]
> <> 105 <tr><td colspan="3"><!-- allow dnd to the bottom of the
> table --></td></tr>
> <> 106 </tbody>
> <> 107 </table>
> <> 108 </div>
> <> 109 </div>
>
>
> From: Derek Wuelfrath [mailto:[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>]
> Sent: 08 October 2015 15:44
> To: ML PF <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] tweaking the create users page
>
> I managed to hide the registration window from view, but the user couldn?t be
> created as this seems to be a required field. Is there a way I can make all
> created users have a certain registration window by default? I?m finding that
> having the registration time, and access duration is confusing to users.
>
> Can you make the fields ?hidden? with a value ?
> That?s how I usually do it
>
> Cheers!
> dw.
>
> ?
> Derek Wuelfrath
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ::
> +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: +1.866.353.6153 (x110) Inverse inc. ::
> Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu <http://www.sogo.nu/>) and
> PacketFence (www.packetfence.org <http://www.packetfence.org/>)
>
> On Oct 7, 2015, at 11:38 AM, Morris, Andi <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> Thanks Derek.
>
> That was really helpful. I managed to hide the registration window from view,
> but the user couldn?t be created as this seems to be a required field. Is
> there a way I can make all created users have a certain registration window
> by default? I?m finding that having the registration time, and access
> duration is confusing to users.
>
> Cheers,
> Andi
>
> From: Derek Wuelfrath [mailto:[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>]
> Sent: 01 October 2015 21:39
> To: ML PF <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] tweaking the create users page
>
> Andi,
>
> It is indeed possible to do it (it?s like zombocom, everything is
> possible). I actually did it for some specific use cases
>
> You would need to create some custom code.
>
> You could have a look at html/pfappserver/root/user/create.tt and add some
> ?hidden? fields.
>
> There?s of course, may have more file to check but basically, that
> should do it :)
>
> Cheers!
> dw.
>
> ?
> Derek Wuelfrath
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> :: www.inverse.ca
> <http://www.inverse.ca/>
> +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: +1.866.353.6153 (x110)
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu
> <http://www.sogo.nu/>) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org
> <http://www.packetfence.org/>)
>
> On Oct 1, 2015, at 11:45, Morris, Andi <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> Is there a way to remove the registration window option and make two actions
> appear by default (access duration and role) in the create users window? I?m
> trying to make this page as simple as possible for the staff creating users.
>
> Cheers,
> Andi
>
> -------------------------------------
> Andi Morris
> IT Security Officer
> Cardiff Metropolitan University
> T: 02920 205720
> E: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> --------------------------------------
>
>
> <image001.jpg> <http://www.cardiffmet.ac.uk/cardiffmet150>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------- _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------- Full-scale, agent-less Infrastructure Monitoring from a
> single dashboard Integrate with 40+ ManageEngine ITSM Solutions for
> complete visibility Physical-Virtual-Cloud Infrastructure monitoring
> from one console Real user monitoring with APM Insights and
> performance trend reports Learn More
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=247754911&iu=/4140______
> _________________________________________
> <http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=247754911&iu=/4140_____
> __________________________________________>
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------- _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------- _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
End of PacketFence-users Digest, Vol 90, Issue 37
*************************************************
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
