Nice, thanks Tim. I’ll put that to my manager and see if we can do something 
like this.

Cheers,
Andi

From: Tim DeNike [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 21 October 2015 17:51
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Recommended setup for HA and efficiency

Move MySQL to a different server on fast storage.  I run 2 MySQL vms in ha on 
ssd storage and that helps.

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 21, 2015, at 12:37 PM, Morris, Andi 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi all,
I’ve recently come into some issues with the load on my PacketFence setup 
during peak times and so we’re now looking at seeing if we can split the 
service into separate components across servers, and also across our two sites 
for high availability.

Loads are currently around 2000 devices concurrently at peak times, all using 
802.1x through the freeradius mschap component to our backend active directory 
server. At peak times there are sometimes 500 devices sitting in the captive 
portal.

Our current setup is a VMWare server with 4vCPUs & 32GB of memory. Inverse have 
had a look and have suggested that our server is being battered by devices in 
our captive portal. However I’m not sure there’s much we can do to alleviate 
this, as it’s a BYOD environment, and we have little to no control over the 
devices that come into the network. I’ve added some apache filters to 501 
certain apps that are hitting the portal, but it doesn’t seem to be making a 
huge difference, and some apps are still hitting the portal even after the 501 
error is given.

So, some quick questions regarding this:

Will moving the MySQL component of the setup onto a dedicated server make a 
marked difference to the performance?

If I gave each university site a PF httpd/radius service, would they both need 
to access one single central MySQL server or would this cause deadlocks?

Is splitting PF into 3 separate components: apache, freeradius and MySQL also 
an option to bring server load down?

Has anyone else run into this sort of issue with devices sitting in the captive 
portal, and if so how do you combat it? Larger environments, what is your setup 
regarding PF hardware and services?

Cheers,
Andi
________________________________

[Image removed by sender. Cardiff Metropolitan University - 150 years of 
nurturing talent]<http://www.cardiffmet.ac.uk/cardiffmet150>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to