Yes!! That was the missing thing.

Thanks!

On 10/30/2015 02:47 PM, Louis Munro wrote:
> In your violation config,  set
>
> actions=email,log,trap
>
> Regards,
> --
> Louis Munro
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  :: www.inverse.ca
> <http://www.inverse.ca>
> +1.514.447.4918 x125  :: +1 (866) 353-6153 x125
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu <http://www.sogo.nu>)
> and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org <http://www.packetfence.org>)
>
>> On Oct 29, 2015, at 16:40 , mourik jan heupink <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Louis,
>>
>> That helped. I was now able to set the violation. however, it seems to
>> have 'expired' immediately. I created a "merit - defaults - to isolation
>> lan" violation, set it to my own host, and it shows like this:
>>
>>> merit - defaults - to isolation lan 2015-10-29 21:37:40 2015-10-29
>>> 21:37:40
>>
>> Release date is the same date/time as the Start date.
>>
>> When searching the host based on violation starts with "merit", I get
>> zero results. So it seems to expired already.
>>
>> This is my violation:
>>
>>> [1500002]
>>> priority=4
>>> trigger=
>>> actions=email,log
>>> max_enable=3
>>> desc=merit - defaults - to isolation lan
>>> enabled=Y
>>> template=generic
>>> auto_enable=N
>>> delay_by=0s
>>> vlan=isolation
>>> grace=120m
>>> whitelisted_categories=
>>> button_text=Enable Network
>>
>> Is there something wrong with my violation?
>>
>> MJ
>>
>> On 10/29/2015 03:29 PM, Louis Munro wrote:
>>> I believe you are missing the “window” option to your defaults:
>>>
>>> Add it to the violations.conf  like this
>>>
>>> [defaults]
>>> window=0
>>> …
>>>
>>> and then try a pfcmd configreload hard.
>>>
>>>
>>> Your violation inherits from those defaults, so the missing value
>>> prevents it from being inserted in the database.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> --
>>> Louis Munro
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>  :: www.inverse.ca <http://www.inverse.ca>
>>> <http://www.inverse.ca>
>>> +1.514.447.4918 x125  :: +1 (866) 353-6153 x125
>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu <http://www.sogo.nu>
>>> <http://www.sogo.nu>)
>>> and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org <http://www.packetfence.org>
>>> <http://www.packetfence.org>)
>>>
>>>> On Oct 29, 2015, at 5:11 , mourik jan heupink <[email protected]
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Here is violations.conf:
>>>>
>>>> [defaults]
>>>> priority=4
>>>> max_enable=3
>>>> actions=email,log
>>>> auto_enable=Y
>>>> enabled=N
>>>> grace=120m
>>>> delay_by=0s
>>>> button_text=Enable Network
>>>> snort_rules=local.rules,emerging-attack_response.rules,emerging-botcc.rules,emerging-exploit.rules,emerging-malware.rules,emerging-p2p.rules,emerging-scan.rules,emerging-shellcode.rules,emerging-trojan.rules,emerging-worm.rules
>>>> # vlan: The vlan parameter allows you to define in what vlan a node with
>>>> a violation will be put in.
>>>> # Accepted values are the vlan names: isolation, normal, registration,
>>>> macDetection, inline, voice
>>>> # and all the roles names you defined in the node_category table. (see
>>>> switches.conf)
>>>> vlan=isolation
>>>> # if you add a role/category here, nodes in these roles/categories will
>>>> be immune to the violation
>>>> whitelisted_categories=
>>>> template=generic
>>>> trigger=
>>>> desc=defaults
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to