Hi Louis. I setup the 'null' source and it works and exactly what I wanted. But I have one issue. How do I track the nodes / users that have been on the network (but are not currently active) I can see the active nodes as 'registered' in the admin. So that's not a problem. But I also want to report on the unregistered nodes i.e. nodes that have been registered in the past but aren't currently active.
I can see some user accounts but I am unable to identify them as they just show up as emails without any other identifiable information like IP from an IP range (which is only applicable to an active registered node) What can I do? I see there are some 'custom fields' available on each email registered. Anyway to use those as part of a source 'rule'? Thanks ________________________________ > From: [email protected] > Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 13:21:27 -0500 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Email Registration > > If you are not going to validate the email, then you might as well use > the “Null” source and simply require email. > > That way you won’t have to mess with the code and you should achieve > the same result. > > -- > Louis Munro > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > :: www.inverse.ca<http://www.inverse.ca> > +1.514.447.4918 x125 :: +1 (866) 353-6153 x125 > Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu<http://www.sogo.nu>) > and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org<http://www.packetfence.org>) > > On Jan 4, 2016, at 12:09 , Andy A > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi > > Using PF 5.2 in inline-mode on Centos 6.X > > When a guest signs up on the captive portal using an email, I would > like to disable sending out verification emails. It's a client > requirement as they think it's a cumbersome user experience. > I have looked at the code. I would like to know if there would be any > negative side-effects for commenting out the following lines of code in > > captiveportal/PacketFence/Controller/Activate/Email.pm > > # Email activated guests only need to prove their email was valid by > clicking on the link. > if ( $activation_record->{'type'} eq $GUEST_ACTIVATION ) { > $c->forward('doEmailRegistration', [$code]); > } > > I would like to know couple of things > 1. Whether commenting out the above lines would accomplish what I am > looking for? > 2. What would be side-effects of doing so? If any. > > Thanks > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > PacketFence-users mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ PacketFence-users > mailing list [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
