Hi there!

I set up a PF 6 in inline configuration for testing on Debian 7.
There is nothing going on on the WLAN - no registered nodes yet.
But after a few hours dhcpd took 100% of one CPU. After restarting dhcpd
the load went back to normal. Then, a few hours later, the same story...

I had a look in the leases file... and there something looks strange to
me. There are overlapping leases:

lease 192.168.3.10 {
  starts 0 2016/04/24 17:26:23;
  ends 1 2016/04/25 17:26:23;
  cltt 0 2016/04/24 17:26:23;
  binding state active;
  next binding state free;
  rewind binding state free;
  hardware ethernet e0:f8:47:aa:bb:cc;
  uid "\001\340\370G\212\0112";
  client-hostname "iPhone";
}
server-duid "\000\001\000\001\036\254\321$\010\000'\377ds";

lease 192.168.3.10 {
  starts 0 2016/04/24 17:41:23;
  ends 1 2016/04/25 17:41:23;
  cltt 0 2016/04/24 17:41:23;
  binding state active;
  next binding state free;
  rewind binding state free;
  hardware ethernet e0:f8:47:aa:bb:cc;
  uid "\001\340\370G\212\0112";
  client-hostname "iPhone";
}
lease 192.168.3.10 {
  starts 0 2016/04/24 17:56:19;
  ends 1 2016/04/25 17:56:19;
  cltt 0 2016/04/24 17:56:19;
  binding state active;
  next binding state free;
  rewind binding state free;
  hardware ethernet e0:f8:47:aa:bb:cc;
  uid "\001\340\370G\212\0112";
  client-hostname "iPhone";
}

Is there maybe a bug in the PF OMAPI part?

Cheers,
Till


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to