Hello Tim,

I am bringing this back up with a few questions !

> #2.  Tracking IA-NA address per host

What do you mean ?

> #3.  Making use of Framed-IPv6-Address RADIUS attribute

To update node ip records ?

> In the end, I think we would probably need to expand the pf.iplog table to be 
> more like (Or have a separate table for ipv6 addresses?  I don't know what is 
> going to be most scalable/efficient):
> 
> mac, ip, start_time, end_time, ip6, start_time6, end_time6, ip6pd, 
> start_time6pd, end_time6pd, ip6na1, start_time6na1, end_time6na1, ip6na2, 
> start_time6na2, end_time6na2

In this scenario, I assume:
- ip6 would be the DHCP6 address;
- ip6pd would be the DHCP6 PD prefix;
- ip6na1 would be the SLAAC address;
- ip6na2 would be the SLAAC temporary (Privacy extension address)

Am I assuming right ?

Also, can you elaborate a bit more on the “PD” just to make sure we are on the 
same page.

Cheers!
— dw.

--
Derek Wuelfrath
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu <https://sogo.nu/>) and 
PacketFence (www.packetfence.org <https://packetfence.org/>)

> On Nov 10, 2016, at 08:23, Tim DeNike <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Is there any progress being made towards functional IPv6 IP tracking in PF?  
> I noticed after I upgraded from 5.7 to 6.3, pfdhcplistener no longer takes 
> the udp_reflector data I was sending from my DHCPv6 servers.  Its like it 
> just ignores it.  ( I know it only ever looked for the 
> fingerprint/vendor/enterprise info and didn't update).
> 
> #1.  Forwarding DHCPv6 using udp_reflector
> #2.  Tracking IA-NA address per host
> #3.  Making use of Framed-IPv6-Address RADIUS attribute
> #4.  Performing firewall SSO updates
> 
> Less Important (At least to me):
> #5.  Tracking IA-PD subnet per host (as a separate field).
> #6.  Figure out a way to forward ND packets to PF for sites that use SLAAC 
> (Maybe snmp queries to routers or sflow data?)
> 
> In the end, I think we would probably need to expand the pf.iplog table to be 
> more like (Or have a separate table for ipv6 addresses?  I don't know what is 
> going to be most scalable/efficient):
> 
> mac, ip, start_time, end_time, ip6, start_time6, end_time6, ip6pd, 
> start_time6pd, end_time6pd, ip6na1, start_time6na1, end_time6na1, ip6na2, 
> start_time6na2, end_time6na2
> 
> 
> Reasoning for so many fields:
> 
> In a network with both SLAAC and DHCP6 enabled, a device could have 4 ipv6 
> addresses.
> 
> 1 - SLAAC address
> 2 - SLAAC temporary (Privacy extensions address)
> 3 - DHCP6 address
> 4 - DHCP6 PD Prefix
> 
> Now this is an improperly configured network, but there could be a legit 
> use-case for it.. You should really only use SLAAC or DHCP6, not both.
> 
> A Windows client will prefer/use the DHCP6 address, but the SLAAC and 
> SLAACtemp address are both valid and usable.
> 
> A Mac client will prefer/use the SLAAC temp address, but the SLAAC and DHCP6 
> address are still valid and usable.
> 
> Android devices dont support DHCP6 (Because google is really stupid_
> 
> IOS Devices behave like OSX devices.
> 
> Most home routers will use DHCP6 address for their own communication,  some 
> will get a SLAAC address, some won't.  Most don't even need the NA address 
> and only require a PD address.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
> Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
> With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
> Training and support from Colfax.
> Order your platform today. 
> http://sdm.link/xeonphi_______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to