Charles what version of packetfence are you using?

James Rouzier
[email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 (x115)  ::  http://www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://www.packetfence.org)

On 2017-04-27 9:49 AM, Charles Rumford wrote:
> On 4/27/17 9:42 AM, Fabrice Durand wrote:
>> Hello Charles,
>>
>> api:desAssociate is when a device is in process of registration or when
>> the unreg date is reached.
>>
>> api:fingerbank_process is probably based on the dhcp traffic the server
>> receive.
>>
>> Do you have some errors in the pfqueue.log ?
> I'm seeing some of the following:
> Apr 27 09:32:28 pfqueue(125776) WARN: [mac:74:75:48:1a:f5:09] Use of
> uninitialized value $n_status in string eq at
> /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/roles.pm line 105.
>   (pf::roles::getRoleForNode)
> Apr 27 09:32:28 pfqueue(125776) ERROR: [mac:74:75:48:1a:f5:09] Use of
> uninitialized value $n_status in string eq at
> /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/roles.pm line 105.
>   (pf::roles::getRoleForNode)
> Apr 27 09:32:28 pfqueue(125776) WARN: [mac:74:75:48:1a:f5:09] Use of
> uninitialized value $n_status in string eq at
> /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/roles.pm line 105.
>   (pf::roles::getRoleForNode)
> Apr 27 09:32:28 pfqueue(125776) ERROR: [mac:74:75:48:1a:f5:09] Use of
> uninitialized value $n_status in string eq at
> /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/roles.pm line 105.
>   (pf::roles::getRoleForNode)
> Apr 27 09:32:28 pfqueue(125776) WARN: [mac:74:75:48:1a:f5:09] Use of
> uninitialized value $mac in concatenation (.) or string at
> /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/roles.pm line 134.
>   (pf::roles::performRoleLookup)
> Apr 27 09:32:28 pfqueue(125776) ERROR: [mac:74:75:48:1a:f5:09] Use of
> uninitialized value $mac in concatenation (.) or string at
> /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/roles.pm line 134.
>   (pf::roles::performRoleLookup)
> Apr 27 09:32:28 pfqueue(125776) WARN: [mac:74:75:48:1a:f5:09] Use of
> uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
> /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/roles.pm line 157.
>   (pf::roles::_assignRoleFromCategory)
> Apr 27 09:32:28 pfqueue(125776) ERROR: [mac:74:75:48:1a:f5:09] Use of
> uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
> /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/roles.pm line 157.
>   (pf::roles::_assignRoleFromCategory)
>
> and
> Apr 27 09:43:01 pfqueue(123784) WARN: [mac:cc:44:63:0b:4d:c6] Use of
> uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/iplog.pm
> line 870.
>   (pf::iplog::__ANON__)
> Apr 27 09:43:01 pfqueue(123784) ERROR: [mac:cc:44:63:0b:4d:c6] Use of
> uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/iplog.pm
> line 870.
>   (pf::iplog::__ANON__)
>
> And a lot of these:
>
> Apr 27 09:43:28 pfqueue(123784) WARN: [mac:ec:9b:f3:95:02:52] Unable to
> perform a Fingerbank lookup for device with MAC address
> 'ec:9b:f3:95:02:52' (pf::fingerbank::__ANON__)
>
> The only thing that I'm getting with relation to CoAs is:
> Apr 27 09:26:27 pfqueue(115173) WARN: [mac:50:7a:55:5a:e8:10] Unable to
> perform RADIUS Disconnect-Request. CoA-NAK received with Error-Cause:
> Session-Context-Not-Found. (pf::Switch::Aruba::radiusDisconnect)
>
> but I'd guess that this is from the pfqueue dumping the back log of CoAs
> and the user no longer on the controller.
>
>
>
>> Regards
>> Fabrice
>>
>> Le 2017-04-27 à 09:36, Charles Rumford a écrit :
>>> This morning we put our PacketFence installation into production.
>>>
>>> One of the first things that I noticed was that it appears that the
>>> pfqueue gets wedged with task types api:desAssociate and
>>> api:fingerbank_process with ever increasing outstanding task counters.
>>>
>>> If I restart the pfqueue, I see radius CoAs being send for a short
>>> period of time, and then nothing, until I restart the pfqueue again.
>>>
>>> Has anyone else seen this? If so, suggestions on how to fix it?
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to