What happen when you do that:
/usr/sbin/haproxy -f /usr/local/pf/var/conf/haproxy.conf
Also can you paste the generate haproxy configuration ?
Fabrice
Le 2017-05-07 à 14:23, Bebbet van Dinges a écrit :
> Hello Fabrice,
>
> Firstly, thanks!
>
> On the admin panel, haproxy i down. When i try to start it i get some
> non-descriptive error
>
> May 07 20:20:35 networklogon.desaad.nl haproxy-systemd-wrapper[19157]:
> [ALERT] 126/202035 (19159) : Fatal errors found in configuration.
>
> Any hint on where to look next? I'll try and get some better error, when
> i succeed, i'll let you know.
>
> Bebbet
>
>
> On 7-5-2017 19:55, Durand fabrice wrote:
>> Hello Bebbet,
>>
>> haproxy is in front of the apache portal , so have a look at haproxy and
>> restart it.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Fabrice
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 2017-05-07 à 13:30, Bebbet van Dinges a écrit :
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I've done a fresh PF install of 7.0.0. Since then i've got issues trying
>>> to reach the portal (status/unreg).
>>>
>>> I've uncovered that the iptables had no 'hole' to allow the management
>>> vlan/interface to reach the input-portal-if chain. Assigning another
>>> role to the management interface (additional services: portal) this
>>> 'restriction' is gone, and tcpdump shows incoming connections and ack's.
>>> Yet there is no service*** enabled on port 80 or 443.
>>>
>>> Ok, there is a httpd.portal service working but only 127.0.0.1. After
>>> some digging my understanding is that in
>>> /usr/local/pf/conf/httpd.conf.d/httpd.portal.tt a foreach section
>>> exists, that generates the url/ips to listen on. After a little more
>>> digging i found sub vhosts in
>>> /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/services/manager/httpd_portal.pm.
>>>
>>> sub vhosts {
>>> my ($self) = @_;
>>> if ($cluster_enabled) {
>>> return
>>> [
>>> uniq map {
>>> defined $_->{'Tvip'} && $_->{'Tvip'} ne '' ?
>>> $_->{'Tvip'} : $_->{'Tip'}
>>> } @internal_nets, @portal_ints
>>> ];
>>> } else {
>>> return ["127.0.0.1"];
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> My setup is not cluster enabled, so the else statement is true, and
>>> 127.0.0.1 is the output of vhosts. which in turn only enables the portal
>>> on localhost.
>>>
>>> How do i enable more vhosts, or did i uncover some kind of bug/loophole?
>>>
>>> Hope to hear soon from you,
>>> Your sincerely,
>>> Bebbet
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
