Hello Fabrice,
I got the raddbug working. See the output below
raddebug -f /usr/local/pf/var/run/radiusd.sock -t 300
(3180) Fri Aug 18 10:00:15 2017: Debug: Received Access-Request Id 34 from
10.1.5.145:40185 to 197.255.124.14:1812 length 164
(3180) Fri Aug 18 10:00:15 2017: Debug: Cleaning up request packet ID 34 with
timestamp +88641
(3181) Fri Aug 18 10:00:19 2017: Debug: Received Access-Request Id 37 from
10.1.5.145:40185 to 197.255.124.14:1812 length 164
(3182) Fri Aug 18 10:00:19 2017: Debug: Received Access-Request Id 36 from
10.1.5.145:40185 to 197.255.124.14:1812 length 164
(3181) Fri Aug 18 10:00:19 2017: Debug: Cleaning up request packet ID 37 with
timestamp +88645
(3182) Fri Aug 18 10:00:19 2017: Debug: Cleaning up request packet ID 36 with
timestamp +88645
(3183) Fri Aug 18 10:00:29 2017: Debug: Received Access-Request Id 40 from
10.1.5.145:40185 to 197.255.124.14:1812 length 164
(3183) Fri Aug 18 10:00:29 2017: Debug: Cleaning up request packet ID 40 with
timestamp +88655
(3184) Fri Aug 18 10:00:32 2017: Debug: Received Access-Request Id 40 from
10.1.5.145:40185 to 197.255.124.14:1812 length 164
(3184) Fri Aug 18 10:00:32 2017: Debug: Cleaning up request packet ID 40 with
timestamp +88658
(3185) Fri Aug 18 10:00:38 2017: Debug: Received Access-Request Id 40 from
10.1.5.145:40185 to 197.255.124.14:1812 length 164
(3185) Fri Aug 18 10:00:38 2017: Debug: Cleaning up request packet ID 40 with
timestamp +88664
(3186) Fri Aug 18 10:00:50 2017: Debug: Received Access-Request Id 40 from
10.1.5.145:40185 to 197.255.124.14:1812 length 164
(3186) Fri Aug 18 10:00:50 2017: Debug: Cleaning up request packet ID 40 with
timestamp +88676
(3187) Fri Aug 18 10:00:51 2017: Debug: Received Access-Request Id 38 from
10.1.5.145:40185 to 197.255.124.14:1812 length 164
(3187) Fri Aug 18 10:00:51 2017: Debug: Cleaning up request packet ID 38 with
timestamp +88677
(3188) Fri Aug 18 10:00:59 2017: Debug: Received Access-Request Id 41 from
10.1.5.145:40185 to 197.255.124.14:1812 length 164
(3188) Fri Aug 18 10:00:59 2017: Debug: Cleaning up request packet ID 41 with
timestamp +88685
(3189) Fri Aug 18 10:01:02 2017: Debug: Received Access-Request Id 41 from
10.1.5.145:40185 to 197.255.124.14:1812 length 164
(3189) Fri Aug 18 10:01:02 2017: Debug: Cleaning up request packet ID 41 with
timestamp +88688
(3190) Fri Aug 18 10:01:08 2017: Debug: Received Access-Request Id 41 from
10.1.5.145:40185 to 197.255.124.14:1812 length 164
(3190) Fri Aug 18 10:01:08 2017: Debug: Cleaning up request packet ID 41 with
timestamp +88694
(3191) Fri Aug 18 10:01:14 2017: Debug: Received Access-Request Id 40 from
10.1.5.145:40185 to 197.255.124.14:1812 length 164
(3191) Fri Aug 18 10:01:14 2017: Debug: Cleaning up request packet ID 40 with
timestamp +88700
(3192) Fri Aug 18 10:01:20 2017: Debug: Received Access-Request Id 41 from
10.1.5.145:40185 to 197.255.124.14:1812 length 164
(3192) Fri Aug 18 10:01:20 2017: Debug: Cleaning up request packet ID 41 with
timestamp +88706
From: Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users
<packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Reply-To: "packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net"
<packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Date: Friday, August 18, 2017 at 12:05 AM
To: "packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net"
<packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Durand fabrice <fdur...@inverse.ca>
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence-ZEN-7.2.0 bandwidth violation not
working
What is the result of:
ps -edf|grep radius
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2017-08-17 à 10:05, Emmanuel Togo a écrit :
Hello Fabrice,
Please see pf status below
/usr/local/pf/bin/pfcmd service pf status
service|shouldBeStarted|pid
carbon-cache|1|18793
carbon-relay|1|18814
collectd|1|18835
dhcpd|1|18873
haproxy|1|18649
httpd.aaa|1|18893
httpd.admin|1|18673
httpd.collector|1|18924
httpd.dispatcher|1|18947
httpd.graphite|1|18975
httpd.parking|1|19013
httpd.portal|1|19042
httpd.proxy|0|0
httpd.webservices|1|19078
iptables|1|-1
keepalived|0|0
p0f|1|0
pfbandwidthd|1|19122
pfdetect||0
pfdhcplistener|1|19153
pfdns|1|19184
pffilter|1|19210
pfmon|1|19237
pfqueue|1|19152
pfsetvlan|1|19280
pfsso|1|19339
radiusd-acct|1|19372
radiusd-auth|1|19408
radiusd-cli|1|19449
radsniff|1|0
redis_ntlm_cache|1|19509
redis_queue|1|19145
routes|1|-1
snmptrapd|1|19279
statsd|1|19563
winbindd|1|19922
From: Fabrice Durand <fdur...@inverse.ca><mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca>
Date: Thursday, August 17, 2017 at 1:46 PM
To: Emmanuel Togo <emat...@ug.edu.gh><mailto:emat...@ug.edu.gh>,
"packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net"<mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
<packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net><mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence-ZEN-7.2.0 bandwidth violation not
working
If radius accounting is not running then you will not be able to receive radius
accounting ...
So bandwidth violation not working will not work.
Le 2017-08-17 à 09:37, Emmanuel Togo a écrit :
Hello Fabrice,
Please see the error message after running raddebug -f
/usr/local/pf/run/radius-acct.sock -t 300
radmin: Failed connecting to /usr/local/pf/run/radius-acct.sock: No such file
or directory
Regards
Emmanuel
From: Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
<packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net><mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Reply-To:
"packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net"<mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
<packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net><mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thursday, August 17, 2017 at 12:18 PM
To:
"packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net"<mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
<packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net><mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Fabrice Durand <fdur...@inverse.ca><mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca>
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence-ZEN-7.2.0 bandwidth violation not
working
raddebug ...
Le 2017-08-17 à 06:12, Emmanuel Togo a écrit :
Hello Fabrice,
raddebuf command is not available.
Regards
Emmanuel
________________________________
From: Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users
<packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net><mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: 26 July 2017 11:59 PM
To:
packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Durand fabrice
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence-ZEN-7.2.0 bandwidth violation not
working
Hello Emmanuel,
it looks that there is just start in your accounting (a way to send
interim update and stop from the AP/Switch ?).
Can you check with:
raddebuf -f /usr/local/pf/run/radius-acct.sock -t 300
and paste few requests ?
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2017-07-26 à 03:38, Emmanuel Togo via PacketFence-users a écrit :
> Hello Fabrice,
> Thank you once again.
> The username in radacct_log is different from mac address. See below the
> output
>
> MariaDB [pf]> select * from radacct_log where username="sophos5";
> +------+-------------------+----------+--------------+----------------+---------------------+-----------------+------------------+-----------------+----------------------------------+
> | id | acctsessionid | username | nasipaddress | acctstatustype |
> timestamp | acctinputoctets | acctoutputoctets | acctsessiontime |
> acctuniqueid |
> +------+-------------------+----------+--------------+----------------+---------------------+-----------------+------------------+-----------------+----------------------------------+
> | 772 | 0000002C-00000019 | sophos5 | 10.1.5.145 | Start |
> 2017-07-20 02:54:44 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> c594c1423a7cde15a0d2ed85743f1d4a |
> | 793 | 0000002C-00000026 | sophos5 | 10.1.5.145 | Start |
> 2017-07-20 09:56:48 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> 22775775af347dee8d387e13406c5f5f |
> | 795 | 0000002C-00000027 | sophos5 | 10.1.5.145 | Start |
> 2017-07-20 09:58:30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> 4ac58d4ddec42d583960a1982f32d62b |
> | 797 | 0000002C-00000028 | sophos5 | 10.1.5.145 | Start |
> 2017-07-20 10:00:58 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> 4ac58d4ddec42d583960a1982f32d62b |
> | 909 | 00010B4E-00000035 | sophos5 | 10.1.5.145 | Start |
> 2017-07-20 15:03:04 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> 22775775af347dee8d387e13406c5f5f |
> | 915 | 00010B4E-00000038 | sophos5 | 10.1.5.145 | Start |
> 2017-07-20 15:25:21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> 22775775af347dee8d387e13406c5f5f |
> | 921 | 00010B4E-0000003C | sophos5 | 10.1.5.145 | Start |
> 2017-07-20 15:40:29 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> 22775775af347dee8d387e13406c5f5f |
> | 925 | 00010B4E-0000003F | sophos5 | 10.1.5.145 | Start |
> 2017-07-20 15:46:58 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> 22775775af347dee8d387e13406c5f5f |
> | 929 | 00010B4E-00000040 | sophos5 | 10.1.5.145 | Start |
> 2017-07-20 15:51:01 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> 22775775af347dee8d387e13406c5f5f |
> | 1008 | 00010B4E-00000064 | sophos5 | 10.1.5.145 | Start |
> 2017-07-21 10:23:59 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> c594c1423a7cde15a0d2ed85743f1d4a |
> | 1038 | 00010B4E-00000073 | sophos5 | 10.1.5.145 | Start |
> 2017-07-21 12:50:49 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> c594c1423a7cde15a0d2ed85743f1d4a |
> | 1232 | 00007844-0000000E | sophos5 | 10.1.5.145 | Start |
> 2017-07-24 16:54:10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> ce7983729464e2b0b3cf6174c4f9e837 |
> | 1286 | 00007844-00000028 | sophos5 | 10.1.5.145 | Start |
> 2017-07-25 11:20:12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> 22775775af347dee8d387e13406c5f5f |
> +------+-------------------+----------+--------------+----------------+---------------------+-----------------+------------------+-----------------+----------------------------------+
> 13 rows in set (0.00 sec)
>
>
> Regards
> Emmanuel
>
> On 7/26/17, 1:22 AM, "Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users"
> <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net><mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> wrote:
>
> an you do that:
>
> select * from radacct_log where username="08:ee:8b:8c:2e:35";
>
> does it return something ?
>
>
> Le 2017-07-25 à 19:30, Emmanuel Togo via PacketFence-users a écrit :
> > Hello Fabrice,
> >
> > Thank you. See the output below
> >
> > +-------------------+-----------+------------+-----------+
> > | callingstationid | acctinput | acctoutput | accttotal |
> > +-------------------+-----------+------------+-----------+
> > | 08:ee:8b:8c:2e:35 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > | 10:2f:6b:7d:87:1b | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > | 1c:23:2c:c2:7e:33 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > | 20:64:32:c8:18:7c | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > | 30:c7:ae:68:2c:7c | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > | 34:31:11:27:65:09 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > | 3c:83:75:c3:38:d9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > | 48:5a:3f:84:75:64 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > | 64:89:9a:14:82:6f | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > | 78:ff:ca:14:4d:e4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > | 78:ff:ca:51:5e:d9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > | 78:ff:ca:6d:97:bf | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > | 84:2e:27:05:f5:9c | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > | 84:38:38:6e:45:08 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > | a4:5e:60:f2:62:e5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > | a8:bb:cf:05:1b:4c | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > | ac:37:43:62:a1:8d | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > | c0:bd:d1:2e:15:1e | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > | c4:9a:02:8e:65:d4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > | cc:5f:bf:2e:c2:5d | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > | d0:22:be:d7:9b:ba | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > | e8:4e:84:da:48:ed | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > | f0:99:bf:28:f1:6c | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > | f0:fc:97:c1:58:cf | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > +-------------------+-----------+------------+-----------+
> > 24 rows in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)
> >
> > On 7/25/17, 11:05 PM, "Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users"
> <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net><mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Emmanuel,
> >
> > can you try that in mysql:
> >
> > SELECT radacct.callingstationid,
> > SUM(radacct_log.acctinputoctets) AS acctinput,
> > SUM(radacct_log.acctoutputoctets) AS acctoutput,
> > SUM(radacct_log.acctinputoctets+radacct_log.acctoutputoctets) AS
> accttotal
> > FROM radacct_log
> > RIGHT JOIN radacct ON radacct_log.acctuniqueid =
> > radacct.acctuniqueid
> > WHERE DAY(timestamp) = DAY(CURRENT_DATE()) AND timestamp
> >= ?
> > GROUP BY radacct.callingstationid
> > HAVING accttotal >= ?;
> >
> > and check if it return some mac address ? (change ? by values)
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Fabrice
> >
> >
> >
> > Le 2017-07-25 à 11:11, Emmanuel Togo via PacketFence-users a
> écrit :
> > > Hello Fabrice,
> > > Yes I have.
> > >
> > > Jul 25 03:16:12 pf pfmon: pfmon(5757) INFO: [mac:unknown]
> getting violations triggers for accounting cleanup
> (pf::accounting::acct_maintenance)
> > > Jul 25 03:16:12 pf pfmon: pfmon(5757) INFO: [mac:unknown] Found
> timeframed accounting policy : TOT2MBD for violation 15000001
> (pf::accounting::acct_maintenance)
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Emmanuel
> > >
> > > On 7/25/17, 3:37 AM, "Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users"
> <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net><mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Emmanuel,
> > >
> > > do you have something related to bandwidth violation in
> pfmon.log ?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Fabrice
> > >
> > > Le 2017-07-19 à 16:08, Emmanuel Togo via PacketFence-users
> a écrit :
> > > > Hi All
> > > >
> > > > I have upgraded Packetfence-6.5.1 to Packetfence-7.2.0
> and bandwidth
> > > > violation of 100MB/Day stop working. Nothing happens
> when a client uses more than
> > > > 100MB traffic.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Emmanuel
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > DISCLAIMER ------------------ NOTE: This e-mail message
> is subject to the University of Ghana email disclaimer see
> http://www.ug.edu.gh/ugemaildisclaimer for disclaimer.
> > > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the
> world's most
> > > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!
> http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > PacketFence-users mailing list
> > > >
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> > > >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
> > >
> > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's
> most
> > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > PacketFence-users mailing list
> > >
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> > >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
> > >
> > >
> > > DISCLAIMER ------------------ NOTE: This e-mail message is
> subject to the University of Ghana email disclaimer see
> http://www.ug.edu.gh/ugemaildisclaimer for disclaimer.
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > PacketFence-users mailing list
> > >
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > _______________________________________________
> > PacketFence-users mailing list
> >
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
> >
> >
> > DISCLAIMER ------------------ NOTE: This e-mail message is subject to
> the University of Ghana email disclaimer see
> http://www.ug.edu.gh/ugemaildisclaimer for disclaimer.
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > _______________________________________________
> > PacketFence-users mailing list
> >
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
>
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
>
> DISCLAIMER ------------------ NOTE: This e-mail message is subject to the
> University of Ghana email disclaimer see
> http://www.ug.edu.gh/ugemaildisclaimer for disclaimer.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
DISCLAIMER ------------------ NOTE: This e-mail message is subject to the
University of Ghana email disclaimer see http://www.ug.edu.gh/ugemaildisclaimer
for disclaimer.
--
Fabrice Durand
fdur...@inverse.ca<mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca> :: +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::
www.inverse.ca<http://www.inverse.ca>
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
(http://packetfence.org)
DISCLAIMER ------------------ NOTE: This e-mail message is subject to the
University of Ghana email disclaimer see http://www.ug.edu.gh/ugemaildisclaimer
for disclaimer.
--
Fabrice Durand
fdur...@inverse.ca<mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca> :: +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::
www.inverse.ca<http://www.inverse.ca>
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
(http://packetfence.org)
DISCLAIMER ------------------ NOTE: This e-mail message is subject to the
University of Ghana email disclaimer see http://www.ug.edu.gh/ugemaildisclaimer
for disclaimer.
DISCLAIMER ------------------ NOTE: This e-mail message is subject to the
University of Ghana email disclaimer see http://www.ug.edu.gh/ugemaildisclaimer
for disclaimer.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
