If Nessus support it then why not but it need to be coded in teh Nessus6
module.

Regards

Fabrice


Le 2017-08-23 à 03:01, Akala Kehinde a écrit :
> Hello Fabrice,
>
> Basically what I was trying to ask is if it's possible to attache more
> than 1 scan policy to a Nessus scan engine. Don't think it's possible.
> Except you create another engine with another policy, and attach both
> scan engines in the connection profile. 
>
> scan.conf
>
> [ENGINE1]
> ip=172.16.100.10
> scannername=Local Scanner
> duration=30s
> categories=staff
> port=8834
> registration=1
> username=nessusadmin
> post_registration=1
> password=pass
> pre_registration=0
> oses=202,1
> nessus_clientpolicy=basic
> type=nessus6
>
> [ENGINE2]
> ip=172.16.100.10
> scannername=Local Scanner
> duration=30s
> categories=staff
> port=8834
> registration=1
> username=nessusadmin
> post_registration=1
> password=pass
> pre_registration=0
> oses=202,1
> nessus_clientpolicy=wannacry
> type=nessus6
>
> Profile.conf
>
> [SNS]
> filter=port:7,port:8
> description=SNS PROFILE
> sources=LDAP
> redirecturl=http://www.mawoh.de
> logo=/common/mawoh.png
> root_module=SNS_PORTAL
> access_registration_when_registered=enabled
> scans=ENGINE1,ENGINE2
>
> Regards,
> Kehinde
>
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 4:47 AM, Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users
> <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> <mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>> wrote:
>
>     Hello Akala,
>
>     yes, based on the os.
>
>     Regards
>
>     Fabrice
>
>
>
>     Le 2017-08-18 à 15:44, Akala Kehinde via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>>     Hello guys.
>>
>>     Will like to know if it's possible to have more than 1 nessus
>>     scan policy configured on PF.
>>
>>     Regards,
>>     Kehinde
>>
>>
>>     
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>     engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     PacketFence-users mailing list
>>     PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>     <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>     <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users>
>
>
>     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>     engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>     _______________________________________________
>     PacketFence-users mailing list
>     PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>     <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>     <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users>
>
>

-- 
Fabrice Durand
fdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://packetfence.org) 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to