Hi Fabrice,

See below:

[root@pfence sysctl.d]# ip route
default via 172.16.7.1 dev eth1
169.254.0.0/30 dev MYDOMAIN-b  proto kernel  scope link  src 169.254.0.2
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0  scope link  metric 1002
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth1  scope link  metric 1003
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0.100  scope link  metric 1004
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0.101  scope link  metric 1005
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0.4  scope link  metric 1006
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0.5  scope link  metric 1007
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0.6  scope link  metric 1008
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0.98  scope link  metric 1009
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0.99  scope link  metric 1010
172.16.4.0/24 dev eth0.4  proto kernel  scope link  src 172.16.4.2
172.16.7.0/24 dev eth1  proto kernel  scope link  src 172.16.7.13
172.16.98.0/24 dev eth0.98  proto kernel  scope link  src 172.16.98.1
172.16.99.0/24 dev eth0.99  proto kernel  scope link  src 172.16.99.1
172.16.100.0/24 dev eth0.100  proto kernel  scope link  src 172.16.100.10
172.16.101.0/24 dev eth0.101  proto kernel  scope link  src 172.16.101.1
[root@pfence sysctl.d]#

[root@pfence sysctl.d]# ip route get 172.16.7.10
172.16.7.10 dev eth1  src 172.16.7.13
    cache
[root@pfence sysctl.d]#



Regards,
Kehinde

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Fabrice Durand <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ok so your issue is related to the route of the system.
>
> do:
>
> ip route
>
> and:
>
> ip route get 172.16.7.10
>
> restart iptables
>
>
>
> Le 2017-08-23 à 15:44, Akala Kehinde a écrit :
>
> Hi Fabrice,
>
> See below:
>
> [root@pfence sysctl.d]# ip netns exec MYDOMAIN ping 172.16.7.10
> PING 172.16.7.10 (172.16.7.10) 56(84) bytes of data.
>
> --- 172.16.7.10 ping statistics ---
> 22 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 21107ms
>
> [root@pfence sysctl.d]# ip netns exec MYDOMAIN nslookup www.google.de
> ;; connection timed out; trying next origin
> ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
>
> [root@pfence sysctl.d]#
>
>
> Regards,
> Kehinde
>
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Let's try that:
>>
>> ip netns exec MYDOMAIN ping 172.16.7.10
>>
>> ip netns exec MYDOMAIN nslookup www.google.de
>>
>> What is the result ?
>>
>> Le 2017-08-23 à 10:55, Akala Kehinde a écrit :
>>
>> Hello Fabrice,
>>
>> Was thinkig, could it be a problem with the winbindd itself.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Kehinde
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Akala Kehinde <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hallo Fabrice,
>>>
>>> [root@pfence sysctl.d]# cat 99-ip_forward.conf
>>> # ip forwarding enabled by packetfence
>>> net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1
>>>
>>> Checked timing already on both servers, it"s d same.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Kehinde
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Akala,
>>>>
>>>> does ip_forward is enable ?
>>>>
>>>> does the time of the packetfence server is the same as the AD server ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Fabrice
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 2017-08-23 à 02:38, Akala Kehinde a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Hello Fabrice,
>>>>
>>>> Kindly see below:
>>>>
>>>> [root@pfence pf]# chroot /chroots/MYDOMAIN wbinfo -u
>>>> could not obtain winbind interface details:
>>>> WBC_ERR_WINBIND_NOT_AVAILABLE
>>>> could not obtain winbind domain name!
>>>> Error looking up domain users
>>>> [root@pfence pf]# chroot /chroots/MYDOMAIN wbinfo -g
>>>> could not obtain winbind interface details:
>>>> WBC_ERR_WINBIND_NOT_AVAILABLE
>>>> could not obtain winbind domain name!
>>>> failed to call wbcListGroups: WBC_ERR_WINBIND_NOT_AVAILABLE
>>>> Error looking up domain groups
>>>> [root@pfence pf]# chroot /chroots/MYDOMAIN wbinfo -t
>>>> could not obtain winbind interface details:
>>>> WBC_ERR_WINBIND_NOT_AVAILABLE
>>>> could not obtain winbind domain name!
>>>> checking the trust secret for domain (null) via RPC calls failed
>>>> failed to call wbcCheckTrustCredentials: WBC_ERR_WINBIND_NOT_AVAILABLE
>>>> Could not check secret
>>>> [root@pfence pf]#
>>>> [root@pfence pf]# chroot /chroots/MYDOMAIN wbinfo -P
>>>> could not obtain winbind interface details:
>>>> WBC_ERR_WINBIND_NOT_AVAILABLE
>>>> could not obtain winbind domain name!
>>>> checking the NETLOGON for domain[] dc connection to "" failed
>>>> failed to call wbcPingDc: WBC_ERR_WINBIND_NOT_AVAILABLE
>>>> [root@pfence pf]# chroot /chroots/MYDOMAIN wbinfo -p
>>>> Ping to winbindd failed
>>>> could not ping winbindd!
>>>> [root@pfence pf]#
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tested with TESTMAWOH.DE but still cannot join..
>>>> It's driving me nuts:)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Kehinde
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 4:44 AM, Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello Akala,
>>>>>
>>>>> what happen if you do that:
>>>>>
>>>>> chroot /chroots/MYDOMAIN
>>>>>
>>>>> wbinfo -u
>>>>>
>>>>> wbinfo -g
>>>>>
>>>>> if there is no usernames or groups displayed then try :
>>>>>
>>>>> dns_name=TESTMAWOH.DE
>>>>> and rejoin
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Fabrice
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 2017-08-22 à 22:21, Akala Kehinde via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello guys,
>>>>>
>>>>> I get this error when trying to join PF to an Active Directory Server:
>>>>>
>>>>> [root@pfence pf]# tail -f /chroots/MYDOMAIN/var/log/samb
>>>>> aMYDOMAIN/log.winbindd
>>>>> [2017/08/23 02:20:34.196193,  0] ../source3/winbindd/winbindd_u
>>>>> til.c:869(init_domain_list)
>>>>>   Could not fetch our SID - did we join?
>>>>> [2017/08/23 02:20:34.196275,  0] ../source3/winbindd/winbindd.c
>>>>> :1408(winbindd_register_handlers)
>>>>>   unable to initialize domain list
>>>>> [2017/08/23 02:20:34.324267,  0] ../source3/winbindd/winbindd_c
>>>>> ache.c:3245(initialize_winbindd_cache)
>>>>>   initialize_winbindd_cache: clearing cache and re-creating with
>>>>> version number 2
>>>>> [2017/08/23 02:20:34.333731,  0] ../source3/winbindd/winbindd_u
>>>>> til.c:869(init_domain_list)
>>>>>   Could not fetch our SID - did we join?
>>>>>
>>>>> [root@pfence pf]#
>>>>>
>>>>> Below is my domain.conf file:
>>>>>
>>>>> [MYDOMAIN]
>>>>> ntlm_cache_filter=(&(samAccountName=*)(!(|(lockoutTime=>0)(u
>>>>> serAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2))))
>>>>> ntlm_cache=disabled
>>>>> registration=0
>>>>> ntlm_cache_expiry=3600
>>>>> dns_name=egelsbach.testmawoh.de
>>>>> dns_servers=172.16.7.10
>>>>> ou=Computers
>>>>> ntlm_cache_on_connection=disabled
>>>>> workgroup=TESTMAWOH
>>>>> ntlm_cache_batch_one_at_a_time=disabled
>>>>> sticky_dc=*
>>>>> ad_server=winserver.egelsbach.testmawoh.de
>>>>> ntlm_cache_batch=disabled
>>>>> server_name=pfence
>>>>> bind_pass=
>>>>> bind_dn=
>>>>>
>>>>> [root@pfence pf]# ps -efd | grep winbindd
>>>>> root     20052     1  7 04:15 ?        00:00:14 winbindd-wrapper
>>>>> root     21912 20052  1 04:18 ?        00:00:00 sudo chroot
>>>>> /chroots/MYDOMAIN /usr/sbin/winbindd -s /etc/samba/MYDOMAIN.conf -l
>>>>> /var/log/sambaMYDOMAIN --foreground
>>>>> root     21913 21912  0 04:18 ?        00:00:00 /usr/sbin/winbindd -s
>>>>> /etc/samba/MYDOMAIN.conf -l /var/log/sambaMYDOMAIN --foreground
>>>>> root     21915  4173  0 04:18 ttyS0    00:00:00 grep --color=auto
>>>>> winbindd
>>>>>
>>>>> [root@pfence pf]# /usr/local/pf/bin/pfcmd service winbindd status
>>>>> service|shouldBeStarted|pid
>>>>> winbindd|1|20052
>>>>> [root@pfence pf]#
>>>>>
>>>>> There is reachability between PF, the AD and DNS servers and all can
>>>>> resolve DNS queries.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have tried everything but just refuses to bind..Whatelse could be
>>>>> wrong pls?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Kehinde
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> PacketFence-users mailing 
>>>>> [email protected]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> ------------------
>>>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Fabrice [email protected] ::  +1.514.447.4918 
>>>> <%28514%29%20447-4918> (x135) ::  www.inverse.ca
>>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
>>>> (http://packetfence.org)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> ------------------
>>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Fabrice [email protected] ::  +1.514.447.4918 <%28514%29%20447-4918> 
>> (x135) ::  www.inverse.ca
>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
>> (http://packetfence.org)
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> _______________________________________________
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>
>>
>
> --
> Fabrice [email protected] ::  +1.514.447.4918 <(514)%20447-4918> 
> (x135) ::  www.inverse.ca
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
> (http://packetfence.org)
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to