Hello Peter,
glad to heard that it works .
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2018-01-29 à 14:44, Truax, Peter via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Fabrice,
I just wanted to give you some feedback on vlan pooling. We upgraded
to 7.4 today. We entered vlan numbers 600,601 into the role for the
switch and it worked perfectly! Thank you so much. I feel like it’s
Christmas and I got just what I wanted. Ha ha.
Peter
*From:*Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users
[mailto:[email protected]]
*Sent:* Friday, January 19, 2018 5:51 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Cc:* Durand fabrice <[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [PacketFence-users] Vlan Pooling Question
Hello Peter,
in fact this feature will be available in 7.4 who will be probably be
release next week.
https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/2675
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2018-01-16 à 13:42, Truax, Peter via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Hello everyone,
We are implementing PacketFence using Out-of-Band enforcement
using MAC Authentication.
We have a situation where we would like to use 2 vlans for the
same role. The vlans would be automatically assigned via some
mechanism. For example, we have more Students than one vlan can
use effectively by best practice. So, we use vlan 600 and 601 to
be “Students.” These are now assigned by our NAC solution via
round-robin that we are replacing with PacketFence.
According to the Administration Guide at
https://packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_Administration_Guide.html
section 10.1, vlan pooling is supported. This sounds like what we
want to do.
Can someone clarify the instructions a bit? Do we configure the
vlan pool in the Role by VLAN ID section of the Switch? And how do
you specify which of the 2 algorithms (hash of username, or
round-robin)?
We have attempted this by inputing 600,601 into the Roles by VLAN
ID, but looking at the debug output, PacketFence sends “600,601”
as the vlan assigned to the switch. Obviously this fails.
Regards,
*Peter Truax*
*Network Administrator*
(360) 688-2240
St. Martin’s University
5000 Abbey Way E
Lacey, WA 98503
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
