Ok so the issue is because your management interface is not the same as
the routing interface.

You have to enable nat on the interface ens33 too. (conf/iptables.conf)



Le 2018-04-18 à 09:17, Xav Tauran via PacketFence-users a écrit :
> And my interface management is ens33.20. VLAN 20 is the management's VLAN
> PacketFence run on a virtual machine on Centos 7, and I configured on
> this virtual machine, only one interface : ens33. 
>
>
> see below :
>
> [root@localhost ~]# sysctl net.ipv4.ip_forward
> net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1
>
> [root@localhost ~]# ip a
> 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN qlen 1
>     link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
>     inet 127.0.0.1/8 <http://127.0.0.1/8> scope host lo
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>     inet6 ::1/128 scope host 
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 2: ens33: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> state UP qlen 1000
>     link/ether 00:0c:29:1f:07:77 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>     inet 192.168.2.200/24 <http://192.168.2.200/24> brd 192.168.2.255
> scope global ens33
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>     inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:fe1f:777/64 scope link 
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 3: ens33.20@ens33: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
> noqueue state UP qlen 1000
>     link/ether 00:0c:29:1f:07:77 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>     inet 192.168.20.200/24 <http://192.168.20.200/24> brd
> 192.168.20.255 scope global ens33.20
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>     inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:fe1f:777/64 scope link 
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 4: ens33.30@ens33: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
> noqueue state UP qlen 1000
>     link/ether 00:0c:29:1f:07:77 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>     inet 192.168.30.200/24 <http://192.168.30.200/24> brd
> 192.168.30.255 scope global ens33.30
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>     inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:fe1f:777/64 scope link 
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 5: ens33.40@ens33: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
> noqueue state UP qlen 1000
>     link/ether 00:0c:29:1f:07:77 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>     inet 192.168.40.200/24 <http://192.168.40.200/24> brd
> 192.168.40.255 scope global ens33.40
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>     inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:fe1f:777/64 scope link 
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 6: ens33.50@ens33: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
> noqueue state UP qlen 1000
>     link/ether 00:0c:29:1f:07:77 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>     inet 192.168.50.200/24 <http://192.168.50.200/24> brd
> 192.168.50.255 scope global ens33.50
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>     inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:fe1f:777/64 scope link 
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 7: ens33.60@ens33: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
> noqueue state UP qlen 1000
>     link/ether 00:0c:29:1f:07:77 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>     inet 192.168.60.200/24 <http://192.168.60.200/24> brd
> 192.168.60.255 scope global ens33.60
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>     inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:fe1f:777/64 scope link 
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 8: virbr0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
> state DOWN qlen 1000
>     link/ether 52:54:00:10:65:62 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>     inet 192.168.122.1/24 <http://192.168.122.1/24> brd
> 192.168.122.255 scope global virbr0
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 9: virbr0-nic: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master
> virbr0 state DOWN qlen 1000
>     link/ether 52:54:00:10:65:62 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> 22: S2008-b@if23: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
> noqueue state UP qlen 1000
>     link/ether 62:66:fe:c4:60:6c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 0
>     inet 169.254.0.2/30 <http://169.254.0.2/30> brd 169.254.0.3 scope
> global S2008-b
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>     inet6 fe80::6066:feff:fec4:606c/64 scope link 
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>
>
> [root@localhost ~]# ping 192.168.6.200
> PING 192.168.6.200 (192.168.6.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from 192.168.6.200 <http://192.168.6.200>: icmp_seq=1 ttl=128
> time=1.60 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.6.200 <http://192.168.6.200>: icmp_seq=2 ttl=128
> time=0.535 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.6.200 <http://192.168.6.200>: icmp_seq=3 ttl=128
> time=1.17 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.6.200 <http://192.168.6.200>: icmp_seq=4 ttl=128
> time=0.739 ms
> ^C
> --- 192.168.6.200 ping statistics ---
> 4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3006ms
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.535/1.013/1.604/0.412 ms
> [root@localhost ~]# 
>
> S2008 is the name of my Active Directory. This Active Directory is on
> a virtual machine (working on Windows Server 2008). 
>
> Thank you for your help. 
>
> Regards,
>
> Xavier
>
>
> 2018-04-18 14:38 GMT+02:00 Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
> <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> <mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>:
>
>     Ok so do you have ipv4_forward enabled (sysctl net.ipv4.ip_forward).
>
>     Can you paste : ip a
>
>     Does the dns 192.168.6.200 answer ?
>
>     What is S2008 ?
>
>
>     Le 2018-04-18 à 08:33, Xav Tauran via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>>     Hello Fabrice,
>>
>>     Thank you for your answer ! 
>>     Yes I mean join PacketFence to my domain.
>>
>>     See below the result :
>>     [root@localhost ~]# ip route get 192.168.6.200
>>     192.168.6.200 via 192.168.2.254 dev ens33 src 192.168.2.200 
>>         cache 
>>     [root@localhost ~]# 
>>
>>     Regards,
>>
>>     Xavier
>>
>>
>>     2018-04-18 14:17 GMT+02:00 Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
>>     <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>     <mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>:
>>
>>         Hello Xav,
>>
>>         When you say bind , you mean join PacketFence to the domain ?
>>
>>         Also what is your management interface and what is returned
>>         by : ip route get 192.168.6.200
>>
>>         Regards
>>
>>         Fabrice
>>
>>
>>
>>         Le 2018-04-18 à 03:39, Xav Tauran via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>>>         Hello, 
>>>
>>>         I made a mock-up to set up Packet Fence for a company. In
>>>         attached, you will find a drawing to my mock-up with the
>>>         differents subnets, and VLAN configured on Packet Fence. I
>>>         use a Stomrshield Firewall, and a Cisco Switch which run on
>>>         GNS3. 
>>>         My Active Directory Server is on the subnet 192.168.6.0/24
>>>         <http://192.168.6.0/24> and Packet Fence, installed on a
>>>         virtual machine's Centos 7 (run under VMWARE), is on the
>>>         subnet 192.168.2.0/24 <http://192.168.2.0/24>. 
>>>         Every devices may to reach with a ping. 
>>>         My problem is when I want to bind Packet Fence to my Active
>>>         Directory from the graphic interface. I have the same
>>>         problem that this person, who has already posted a message
>>>         on the support. (check
>>>         on https://sourceforge.net/p/packetfence/mailman/message/36009451/
>>>         <https://sourceforge.net/p/packetfence/mailman/message/36009451/>)
>>>         But the solution that the person give her, doesn't work for
>>>         me... However I follow 
>>>         the instructions that this person gave him
>>>
>>>         Can you help me please? :) I will give you, all the
>>>         informations that you need !
>>>
>>>         Ps : Sorry for my english i'm French
>>>
>>>         Thank you.
>>>
>>>         Kind regards,
>>>
>>>         Xavier TAURAN 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>         Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>         engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>
>>>
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>         PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>         <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>>         https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users>
>>
>>         -- 
>>         Fabrice Durand
>>         fdur...@inverse.ca <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca> ::  +1.514.447.4918 
>> (x135) ::  www.inverse.ca <http://www.inverse.ca>
>>         Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and 
>> PacketFence (http://packetfence.org) 
>>
>>
>>         
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>         Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>         engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         PacketFence-users mailing list
>>         PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>         <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>         https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>     engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     PacketFence-users mailing list
>>     PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>     <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>     <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users>
>
>     -- 
>     Fabrice Durand
>     fdur...@inverse.ca <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca> ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) 
> ::  www.inverse.ca <http://www.inverse.ca>
>     Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
> (http://packetfence.org) 
>
>
>     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>     engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>     _______________________________________________
>     PacketFence-users mailing list
>     PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>     <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>     <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

-- 
Fabrice Durand
fdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://packetfence.org) 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to