Hello Cristian,

pfdns is suppose to resolv the portal fqdn if the device is unreg or if
there is a violation.

Also if there is a passthrough that match the portal fqdn name then it
will forward the request to another server.

Portal interface is just an interface with the portal on it, it
generally use for web auth.
Regards
Fabrice


Le 2018-04-27 à 09:34, Cristian Mammoli via PacketFence-users a écrit :
> Hi, isn't pfdns supposed to resolve the portal FQDN from isolation and
> registration vlan? I'm using 8.0
>
> ATM for me isn't working:
>
> My pf.conf is:
>
> [general]
> #
> # general.domain
> #
> # Domain name of PacketFence system.
> domain=apra.it
> #
> # general.hostname
> #
> # Hostname of PacketFence system.  This is concatenated with the
> domain in Apache rewriting rules and therefore must be resolvable by
> clients.
> hostname=nac
>
> But the requests for "nac.apra.it" are forwarded upstream.
>
> Btw, whats the network interface type "portal" for? Are the client
> supposed to reach this interface for the portal? Is it mandatory?
>
> Thanks
>
> C.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

-- 
Fabrice Durand
fdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://packetfence.org) 



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to