hi fabrice.

i already try the code and it work well.
i try with limit 1 node per user with DEFAULT role.

but i have something strange.

when user rejected/denied by the packetfence, i saw user will be in REJECT
role.
and then i try to deregister the first device from nodes tab, then i try
again with my second device with REJECT role and i still can't connect with
my network and still with REJECT role.
i must configure manual in nodes tab to apply role DEFAULT to my REJECT
device, and then try to reconnect again to get acess to network.

is it normal ?

here my packetfence log.





On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 7:42 PM, Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users <
packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> Hello Jabang,
>
> thanks for testing it.
>
> Also for the limitation, i did some work on that not a long time ago and
> it should be fixed by https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/
> inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/3236.diff
>
> Can you test it too and let me know.
>
> Regards
>
> Fabrice
>
>
>
> Le 2018-05-30 à 00:23, jabang konate via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>
> hi fabrice
> thanks a lot and great work.
>
> now i can login with my local realm and remote realm from other university.
>
> i have  another question,is it possible to limit device node per user in
> eduroam?
> i try with default role to limit 2 devices, but when third devices login
> with the same username , user can still login but with blank role in
> packetfence web.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 11:36 PM, Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users <
> packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
>> Hello Jabang,
>>
>> can you try that:
>>
>> https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/compare/fix/eduro
>> am_standalone.diff
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Fabrice
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 2018-05-25 à 03:50, jabang konate via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>>
>> hi fabrice,
>> ok i will wait for patch
>>
>> thank you
>>
>> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 1:33 AM, Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users <
>> packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok there is a bug, i need to fix it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 2018-05-24 à 11:33, jabang konate via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>>>
>>> hi fabrice.
>>>
>>> 10.18.23.60 is ip National Roaming Operator  eduroam in my Country.
>>>
>>> attach my eduroam config file.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users <
>>> packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What is 10.18.23.60 ?
>>>>
>>>> can you share with me your file /usr/local/pf/raddb/sites-enabled/eduroam
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> Le 2018-05-24 à 00:46, jabang konate via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Hi fabrice,
>>>> today i try again with my packetfence.
>>>>
>>>> in packetfence-tunnel configuration i change configuration like
>>>> this,
>>>>    if (update) {
>>>>             update control {
>>>>                 &MS-CHAP-Use-NTLM-Auth := No
>>>>             }
>>>>         }
>>>>      }
>>>> because from the output i don't see "ok", and then now i can login with
>>>> my ldap account but with port 1812 in my access point, but not using port
>>>> 11812.
>>>> if i'm using 11812 my request always forward to Realm eduroam my home
>>>> server, and not forward the request to packetfence virtual server
>>>> (sites-enabled/packetfence then site-enabled/packetfence-tunnel) as
>>>> you said in scenario 1.
>>>>
>>>> (1) Thu May 24 11:06:15 2018: Debug: suffix: Checking for suffix after
>>>> "@"
>>>> (1) Thu May 24 11:06:15 2018: Debug: suffix: Looking up realm "
>>>> xyz.ac.id" for User-Name = "testu...@xyz.ac.id"
>>>> (1) Thu May 24 11:06:15 2018: Debug: suffix: Found realm "xyz.ac.id"
>>>> (1) Thu May 24 11:06:15 2018: Debug: suffix: Adding Stripped-User-Name
>>>> = "testuser"
>>>> (1) Thu May 24 11:06:15 2018: Debug: suffix: Adding Realm = "xyz.ac.id"
>>>> (1) Thu May 24 11:06:15 2018: Debug: suffix: Authentication realm is
>>>> LOCAL
>>>> (1) Thu May 24 11:06:15 2018: Debug:     [suffix] = ok
>>>> (1) Thu May 24 11:06:15 2018: Debug: ntdomain: Request already has
>>>> destination realm set.  Ignoring
>>>> (1) Thu May 24 11:06:15 2018: Debug:     [ntdomain] = noop
>>>> (1) Thu May 24 11:06:15 2018: Debug:     if (User-Name =~ /@/) {
>>>> (1) Thu May 24 11:06:15 2018: Debug:     if (User-Name =~ /@/)  -> TRUE
>>>> (1) Thu May 24 11:06:15 2018: Debug:     if (User-Name =~ /@/)  {
>>>> (1) Thu May 24 11:06:15 2018: Debug:       update control {
>>>> (1) Thu May 24 11:06:15 2018: Debug:       } # update control = noop
>>>> (1) Thu May 24 11:06:15 2018: Debug:     } # if (User-Name =~ /@/)  =
>>>> noop
>>>> (1) Thu May 24 11:06:15 2018: Debug:     ... skipping else: Preceding
>>>> "if" was taken
>>>> (1) Thu May 24 11:06:15 2018: Debug: eap: Request is supposed to be
>>>> proxied to Realm eduroam. Not doing EAP.
>>>> (1) Thu May 24 11:06:15 2018: Debug:     [eap] = noop
>>>>
>>>> attach my radiusd-eduroam.sock log and picture of my configurutiaon
>>>> exclusive source eduroam .
>>>>
>>>> Regards.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:49 AM, Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
>>>> <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 2018-05-23 à 13:36, jabang konate via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi fabrice.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for speedy response.
>>>>>
>>>>> > so i am not sure what you try to do with the ldap module.
>>>>> ldap module for configuration user with openldap right? i read in EAP
>>>>> Authentication against OpenLDAP.
>>>>>
>>>>> yes, the only difference is that you have to disable NTLM-Auth if ldap
>>>>> return ok to avoid "ERROR: mschap: Program returned code (1) and output
>>>>> 'Reading winbind reply failed! (0xc0000001)'".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> > You have 3 scenarios:
>>>>> yes i want like that,
>>>>>
>>>>> I will try again and will share the results on this topic.
>>>>>
>>>>> thank you for your advice fabrice.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:22 AM, Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
>>>>> <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello Jabang,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> so i am not sure what you try to do with the ldap module.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You have 3 scenarios:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1: a user from your university connect on the ssid eduroam from your
>>>>>> university.  (the ap/controller use the port 11812)
>>>>>> You need to configure the local realm (let's say myuniversity.org)
>>>>>> in the eduroam authentication source and configure ldap in
>>>>>> packetfence-tunnel.
>>>>>> So when this user will try to connect on the eduroam ssid with
>>>>>> u...@myuniversity.org then the eduroam virtual server will detect
>>>>>> the realm myuniversity.org and forward the request to packetfence
>>>>>> virtual server (sites-enabled/packetfence then
>>>>>> site-enabled/packetfence-tunnel).
>>>>>> And in packetfence-tunnel you have something like that:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ```
>>>>>> authorize {
>>>>>>         suffix
>>>>>>         ntdomain
>>>>>>         eap {
>>>>>>                 ok = return
>>>>>>         }
>>>>>>         files
>>>>>>         ldap
>>>>>>         if (ok) {
>>>>>>             update control {
>>>>>>                 &MS-CHAP-Use-NTLM-Auth := No
>>>>>>             }
>>>>>>         }
>>>>>>     }
>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2: u...@myuniversity.org is in travel and connect on the ssid
>>>>>> eduroam in montreal university
>>>>>> The local montreal radius server will forward to eduroam and eduroam
>>>>>> will forward to your packetfence server on the port 1812 (you need to
>>>>>> configure that on the eduroam side).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3: u...@univmontreal.org is connecting on your ssid eduroam, the
>>>>>> realm in unknow then the request will be forwarded to eduroam then 
>>>>>> eduroam
>>>>>> forward to the montreal radius server.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is it what you want to do ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Fabrice
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 2018-05-23 à 12:57, jabang konate via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Fabrice, let me clear my goals first. i'm still confuse which
>>>>>> file i must to configure packetfence-tunnel or eduroam file in
>>>>>> sites-available.
>>>>>> my packetfence will be act as manage eduroam user so i will use port
>>>>>> 11812 in my access point.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> here's my step how i configure my eduroam in packetfence.
>>>>>> 1. setting my local REALM.
>>>>>> 2. configure exclusive source eduroam, add my local realm at step 1.
>>>>>> then create authentication rules "catch all" role default access duration
>>>>>> 12 hours.
>>>>>> 3. add switch configuration
>>>>>> 4. configure ldap module in freeradius
>>>>>> 5. configure file packetfence-tunnel ? or eduroam ?
>>>>>> 6. restart freeradius and iptables
>>>>>>
>>>>>> in step 5 im still confuse if i'm using 11812 so i must configure
>>>>>> eduroam file or still packetfence-tunnel ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Fabrice Durand via
>>>>>> PacketFence-users <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If it's a server for eduroam (like the eduroam servers use this
>>>>>>> server for your domain) then 1812, if it's to manage eduroam user how
>>>>>>> connect on a eduroam ssid then 11812.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also what you can do in packetfence-tunnel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     #  The ldap module reads passwords from the LDAP database.
>>>>>>>     ldap
>>>>>>>     if (ok) {
>>>>>>>         update control {
>>>>>>>             &MS-CHAP-Use-NTLM-Auth := No
>>>>>>>         }
>>>>>>>     }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fabrice
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Le 2018-05-23 à 11:38, jabang konate via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks for your reply fabrice.
>>>>>>> here i attach my packetfence-tunnel file.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and which port should i use for my access point 1812 or 11812 in
>>>>>>> radius configuration for eduroam?
>>>>>>> thank you
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 7:33 PM, Fabrice Durand via
>>>>>>> PacketFence-users <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello Jabang,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> can you paste your packetfence-tunnel file ?
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fabrice
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Le 2018-05-23 à 04:08, jabang konate via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> my packetfence server version is 8.0.1 and i want to configure
>>>>>>>> packetfence as an eduroam server with openldap as user database,
>>>>>>>> then i look into documentation eduroam section from packetfence and
>>>>>>>> EAP Authentication against OpenLDAP.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> when im try to login with my laptop, i always get access reject.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> from log i see i can connect with my ldap server, then i see error
>>>>>>>> like this
>>>>>>>> (7) Wed May 23 14:32:55 2018: ERROR: mschap: Program returned code
>>>>>>>> (1) and output 'Reading winbind reply failed! (0xc0000001)'
>>>>>>>> (7) Wed May 23 14:32:55 2018: Debug: mschap: External script failed
>>>>>>>> (7) Wed May 23 14:32:55 2018: ERROR: mschap: External script says:
>>>>>>>> Reading winbind reply failed! (0xc0000001)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> is it the root cause why i alwayas get access reject?
>>>>>>>> then i check winbindd service is not running, but i cant start
>>>>>>>> winbindd service
>>>>>>>> (Service 'winbindd' is not managed by PacketFence. Therefore, no
>>>>>>>> action will be performed)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> attach my radius log.
>>>>>>>> please give me some advice.
>>>>>>>> thank you
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>>>>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> PacketFence-users mailing 
>>>>>>>> listPacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>>>>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>>>>>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>>>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> PacketFence-users mailing 
>>>>>>> listPacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Fabrice durandfdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  
>>>>>>> www.inverse.ca
>>>>>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and 
>>>>>>> PacketFence (http://packetfence.org)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>>>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>>>>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> PacketFence-users mailing 
>>>>>> listPacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Fabrice durandfdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  
>>>>>> www.inverse.ca
>>>>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
>>>>>> (http://packetfence.org)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>>>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> PacketFence-users mailing 
>>>>> listPacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Fabrice durandfdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  
>>>>> www.inverse.ca
>>>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
>>>>> (http://packetfence.org)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> ------------------
>>>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PacketFence-users mailing 
>>>> listPacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Fabrice durandfdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  
>>>> www.inverse.ca
>>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
>>>> (http://packetfence.org)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> ------------------
>>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PacketFence-users mailing 
>>> listPacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fabrice durandfdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  
>>> www.inverse.ca
>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
>>> (http://packetfence.org)
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ------------------
>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PacketFence-users mailing 
>> listPacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>
>>
>> --
>> Fabrice durandfdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  
>> www.inverse.ca
>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
>> (http://packetfence.org)
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> _______________________________________________
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing 
> listPacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
>
> --
> Fabrice durandfdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  www.inverse.ca
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
> (http://packetfence.org)
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
>

Attachment: packetfence.log
Description: Binary data

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to