Hello Johan,

in the code PacketFence need to have a snmp access to resolve the ifindex of the port. (https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/blob/devel/lib/pf/Switch/H3C.pm#L183)

So right now snmp is mandatory.

Regards

Fabrice




Le 2018-06-18 à 04:25, Johan Thomas via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Hello Fabrice,

Sure, i'm using the H3C::S5120 switch module
Here is the log files when connecting an unreg device (i havent configured the SNMP) :
*Packetfence.log :*

    Jun 18 10:16:35 packetfence packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(5402)
    ERROR: [mac:8c:ec:4b:e3:7e:00] error creating SNMP v1 read
    connection to 192.168.0.200 <http://192.168.0.200>: No response
    from remote host "192.168.0.200" (pf::Switch::connectRead)
    Jun 18 10:16:35 packetfence packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(5402)
    INFO: [mac:8c:ec:4b:e3:7e:00] handling radius autz request: from
    switch_ip => (192.168.0.200), connection_type =>
    WIRED_MAC_AUTH,switch_mac => (Unknown), mac =>
    [8c:ec:4b:e3:7e:00], *_port => 0_*, username =>
    "8c-ec-4b-e3-7e-00" (pf::radius::authorize)
    Jun 18 10:16:35 packetfence packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(5402)
    INFO: [mac:8c:ec:4b:e3:7e:00] Instantiate profile default
    (pf::Connection::ProfileFactory::_from_profile)
    Jun 18 10:16:35 packetfence packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(5402)
    INFO: [mac:8c:ec:4b:e3:7e:00] is of status unreg; belongs into
    registration VLAN (pf::role::getRegistrationRole)
    Jun 18 10:16:35 packetfence packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(5402)
    INFO: [mac:8c:ec:4b:e3:7e:00] (192.168.0.200) Added VLAN 3 to the
    returned RADIUS Access-Accept (pf::Switch::returnRadiusAccessAccept)
    Jun 18 10:18:27 packetfence pfipset[6451]:
    t=2018-06-18T10:18:27+0200 lvl=info msg="Reloading ipsets" pid=6451

*Radius.log :*

    Jun 18 10:16:35 packetfence auth[5757]: Need 2 more connections to
    reach min connections (3)
    Jun 18 10:16:35 packetfence auth[5757]: rlm_rest (rest): Opening
    additional connection (29), 1 of 63 pending slots used
    Jun 18 10:16:35 packetfence auth[5757]: Need 1 more connections to
    reach min connections (3)
    Jun 18 10:16:35 packetfence auth[5757]: rlm_sql (sql): Opening
    additional connection (47), 1 of 62 pending slots used
    Jun 18 10:16:35 packetfence auth[5757]: [mac:8c:ec:4b:e3:7e:00]
    Accepted user:  and returned VLAN 3
    Jun 18 10:16:35 packetfence auth[5757]: (34190) Login OK:
    [8c-ec-4b-e3-7e-00] (from client 192.168.0.200 port *16797697* cli
    8c:ec:4b:e3:7e:00)


Thanks in advance !
Johan




2018-06-14 20:02 GMT+02:00 Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:

    Hello Johan,

    can you paste the packetfence.log, the radius audit log entry
    (Radius request) and the switch module you are using ?


    Regards

    Fabrice



    Le 2018-06-14 à 10:27, Johan Thomas via PacketFence-users a écrit :
    Hi,

    We are installing packetfence and we have a lot of HPE 1920 and 1910.
    I'm testing them with packetfence but i'm having a strange behavior.
    Packetfence receive the Radius request, the port received the
    registration VLAN but the switch port is not good in the
    interface: we only see "port 0".

    I have launched a raddebug:

      * NAS-Port is 16805889
      * NAS-Port-Id is "slot=1;subslot=0;port=7;vlanid=1" (and here
        the port is ok)

    Can i make something to have the port ok ?
    Thanks in advance

    Johan



    
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
    engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!http://sdm.link/slashdot


    _______________________________________________
    PacketFence-users mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
    <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users>

-- Fabrice Durand
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) 
::www.inverse.ca <http://www.inverse.ca>
    Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://packetfence.org)


    
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
    engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
    _______________________________________________
    PacketFence-users mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
    <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users>




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot


_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to