Hi all, 

I have problems while finishing the inital configuration of Packetfence (first 
steps after the installation). 

It's very irritating, because I tried on various virtual maschines with current 
updates (Debian 8, CentOS 7) and virtualizer (Xen, VMWare). 

I can complete the installation with success, but as soon as I start the 
initial configuration in the web browser (https://server:1443/), the system 
begins to become unstable. 

Sometimes I can't go to step 2 (networks), because nothing happens, when I 
click on Continue" (after activating VLAN Enforcment or something else). 

When it works, then I sometimes have problems to configure the network 
interfaces/vlans (error connecting the server"). 

In unsual cases, I can finish the configuration with this errors until step 7, 
where I have to start all the services. But this last step haven't worked until 
now. 

I tried with varios internet browsers 

I noticed, that as soon as I start the initial configuration on the web GUI, 
the following syslog error logs appear: 

_httpd_admin: httpd.admin(10478) FATAL: [mac:[undef]] unable to connect to 
database: Access denied for user 'pf'@'localhost' (using password: YES) at 
/usr/local/pf/lib/pf/WebAPI/InitHandler.pm line 50.#012 (pf::db::db_connect)_ 

I do not understand these circumstances, because this user is configured in 
step 3 (data base config) of the initial configuration (and not before). But it 
seems, that the system needs this user before the initial configuration?  

Nevertheless, there is a pf user configured in the pfconfig.conf file, after I 
tried the initial configuration 

I also tried to start the services manually, but it didn't work. 

It seems, that the hole software package is unstable, especially the web gui 
during the initial configuration. 

I hope, that somebody has an idea - it's very frustrating. :/ Thank you for 
considering my request! 

Best regards,
Jona 

Additonal informations: 

During the installation of Packetfence and it's dependencies, there are the 
following event logs, that seems to be unusual: 

_DBIx::Class::Schema::Versioned::_on_connect(): Your DB is currently 
unversioned. Please call upgrade on your schema to sync the DB. at 
db/upgrade.pl line 37_ 

_DBIx::Class::Schema::Versioned::upgrade_single_step(): DB version (1.0) is 
lower than the schema version (4.1). Attempting upgrade._ 

_DBIx::Class::Schema::Versioned::upgrade_single_step(): DB version (2.0) is 
lower than the schema version (4.1). Attempting upgrade._ 

_DBIx::Class::Schema::Versioned::upgrade_single_step(): DB version (2.1) is 
lower than the schema version (4.1). Attempting upgrade._ 

_DBIx::Class::Schema::Versioned::upgrade_single_step(): DB version (2.2) is 
lower than the schema version (4.1). Attempting upgrade._ 

_DBIx::Class::Schema::Versioned::upgrade_single_step(): DB version (2.3) is 
lower than the schema version (4.1). Attempting upgrade._ 

_DBIx::Class::Schema::Versioned::upgrade_single_step(): DB version (3.0) is 
lower than the schema version (4.1). Attempting upgrade._ 

_DBIx::Class::Schema::Versioned::upgrade_single_step(): DB version (3.1) is 
lower than the schema version (4.1). Attempting upgrade._ 

_DBIx::Class::Schema::Versioned::upgrade_single_step(): DB version (4.0) is 
lower than the schema version (4.1). Attempting upgrade._ 

_Could not write namespace config::PfDefault to L2 cache !_ 

_Could not write namespace config::Documentation to L2 cache !_ 

_Could not write namespace config::Cluster to L2 cache !_ 

_Could not write namespace config::Pf to L2 cache !_ 

_keys on reference is experimental at 
/usr/local/pf/lib/pfconfig/namespaces/config/Stats.pm line 41._ 

_Could not write namespace config::Network to L2 cache !_ 

_Could not write namespace interfaces to L2 cache !_ 

_Could not write namespace resource::network_config to L2 cache !_ 

_[]_  

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FreeMail powered by mail.de - MEHR SICHERHEIT, SERIOSITÄT UND KOMFORT
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
  • [PacketFence-users] Initial c... mail_an_mich--- via PacketFence-users

Reply via email to