Yes you need to configure the accounting on the cisco switch.

Le 19-02-07 à 00 h 25, Wifi Guy via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Thanks. Does this mean I need to add something? Or should something be working that is not?

Thanks

On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 at 23:30, Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>> wrote:

    Hello Wifi,

    i think the reconfiguration is made by the accounting. (accounting
    stop)
    https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/blob/devel/lib/pf/radius.pm#L421

    Regards

    Fabrice


    Le 19-02-06 à 08 h 21, Wifi Guy via PacketFence-users a écrit :
    Hi  Fabrice

    Thanks for the note. So this seems to work pushing the config
    down....

    *Cisco 2960 switchport before connecting AP*

    /interface FastEthernet0/1/

    / switchport mode access/

    / authentication order dot1x mab/

    / authentication priority dot1x mab/

    / authentication port-control auto/

    / authentication periodic/

    / authentication timer restart 10800/

    / authentication timer reauthenticate 7200/

    / authentication violation replace/

    / mab/

    / no snmp trap link-status/

    / dot1x pae authenticator/

    / dot1x timeout quiet-period 2/

    / dot1x timeout tx-period 3/

    / spanning-tree portfast/

    /!/

    /
    /

    *SNMP trigger from PF*

    /Feb  6 10:47:23.655: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from
    172.16.0.148 by snmp/

    /Feb  6 10:47:23.663: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from
    172.16.0.148 by snmp/

    /Feb  6 10:47:23.689: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from
    172.16.0.148 by snmp/

    /Feb  6 10:47:23.705: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from
    172.16.0.148 by snmp/

    /Feb  6 10:47:24.695: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on
    Interface FastEthernet0/1, changed state to down/

    /Feb  6 10:47:27.707: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on
    Interface FastEthernet0/1, changed state to up/

    /Feb  6 10:47:28.772: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from
    172.16.0.148 by snmp/

    /Switch#/

    /
    /

    *Switchport configuration once the SNMP commands are pushed*

    /interface FastEthernet0/1/

    /switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,2,10,20,30,40,50,60,100/

    / switchport mode trunk/

    / authentication order dot1x mab/

    / authentication priority dot1x mab/

    / authentication periodic/

    / authentication timer restart 10800/

    / authentication timer reauthenticate 7200/

    / authentication violation replace/

    / mab/

    / dot1x pae authenticator/

    / dot1x timeout quiet-period 2/

    / dot1x timeout tx-period 3/

    / spanning-tree portfast/

    /!/


    Once the AP has been removed however, the port is not
    reconfigured back? The admin guide seems to indicate this will
    happen..

    When PF receives a linkdown trap on a port in which a floating
    network device was plugged, it changes the port configuration so
    that:

     *

        it enables port-security

     *

        it disables linkdown traps


    On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 at 02:25, Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users
    <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
    <mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>> wrote:

        Hello Wifi,

        Floating device works with radius, so a port with 802.1x/MAB
        enabled should work.

        Regards

        Fabrice


        Le 19-02-05 à 09 h 11, Wifi Guy via PacketFence-users a écrit :
        Hi All,

        I have some Cisco 2960s in my network. I am doing MAB and
        802.1X on the ports for users that connect. This seems to
        work ok with COA etc.

        My question is how do I handle devices like APs that might
        connect to the same port? For ease of administration it
        would be good to use a feature like "floating devices". As I
        understand it this feature enables you to plug a device that
        has been pre registered in the database (via MAC address) to
        any switch port and it will configure it as a trunk. Looks
        like this needs to use port security to trigger? As I also
        understand the Cisco 2960s cannot use MAB/802.1X and Port
        secuirty at the same time

        Am i correct? Or have I missed something?


        _______________________________________________
        PacketFence-users mailing list
        PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net  
<mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
        https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
        _______________________________________________
        PacketFence-users mailing list
        PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
        <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
        https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users



    _______________________________________________
    PacketFence-users mailing list
    PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net  
<mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
    _______________________________________________
    PacketFence-users mailing list
    PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
    <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users



_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to