Hello Olivier,
On 2019-04-08 1:36 p.m., Olivier Gelin wrote:
I applied the maintenance script and restarted right after.
1. Did you mean that pfdhcp broke after applying maintenance script ? Do
you have done some customization in pfdhcp binary ?
2. Each time pfdhcp complains about it "cannot assign requested
address", I see these messages:
```
Apr 8 12:33:40 sl006282 pfdhcp[5695]: t=2019-04-08T12:33:40+0200
lvl=info msg="Setting log level to INFO"
Apr 8 12:33:40 sl006282 pfdhcp[5695]: t=2019-04-08T12:33:40+0200
lvl=info msg="enp10s0 got the VIP" pid=5695
[..]
Apr 8 12:33:41 sl006282 pfdhcp[5708]: t=2019-04-08T12:33:41+0200
lvl=info msg="Setting log level to INFO"
Apr 8 12:33:41 sl006282 pfdhcp[5708]: t=2019-04-08T12:33:41+0200
lvl=info msg="enp10s0 got the VIP" pid=5708
[..]
Apr 8 12:33:41 sl006282 pfdhcp[5717]: t=2019-04-08T12:33:41+0200
lvl=info msg="Setting log level to INFO"
Apr 8 12:33:41 sl006282 pfdhcp[5717]: t=2019-04-08T12:33:41+0200
lvl=info msg="enp10s0 got the VIP" pid=5717
```
Your network interface which get VIP doesn't seem stable. Are you in a
cluster ?
The pfdhcp service has restarted, however the prefixed network is no longer the same. the network took into consideration was the one introduced in "Registration IP Address CIDR format"
Could you give more details like:
- expected results
- actual results
?
--
Nicolas Quiniou-Briand
[email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 *140 :: https://inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (https://sogo.nu), PacketFence
(https://packetfence.org) and Fingerbank (http://fingerbank.org)
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
