Ignore this it is conflicting with our existing pki infrastructure.

From: Peter Reissenweber
Sent: Thursday, 8 August 2019 3:03 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Windows clients

I have tested my config with an Android phone and it works however I can't get 
it to work for windows clients. There seems to be an issue with TLS and I have 
valid cert chain from Let's Encrypt for both HTTP and RADIUS.

Environment:-

Aruba Instant Access points
Windows Active Directory Source using servicePrincipalName have also tried 
sAMAccountName
Profile Filter Wireless-802.11-EAP
Role by Switch for type Aruba::ArubaInstant

It is sending the computer name rather than username even if I manually type it 
in. I can't see any roles assigned in the logs but not sure why they are 
defined in the policies.

See attached debug and radius.log output.

Any help is appreciated.

Thanks

Peter Reissenweber
Network Engineer
D: +61 7 3331 5573
[cid:[email protected]]<http://www.gbst.com/>          
[cid:[email protected]] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/gbst> 
[cid:[email protected]] <https://twitter.com/gbstholdings>




The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and / or privileged material that 
may be governed by confidential information provisions contained in the 
agreement between GBST and your company. Any disclosure, copying, distribution, 
or other use without the express consent of the sender is prohibited. If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from 
any computer. All rights in the information transmitted, including copyright, 
are reserved. Nothing in this message should be interpreted as a digital 
signature that can be used to authenticate a document. No warranty is given by 
the sender that any attachments to this email are free from viruses or other 
defects.
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to