Thanks I tried that and rebooted packetfence. Aruba had me upgrade the IAPs and 
switch the preferred VC to a later model IAP (from 105 to 325) and do another 
packet capture but still the same result.

admin@ip-10-11-8-37:/usr/local/pf/conf$ less switches.conf
[172.28.5.250]
cliTransport=SSH
radiusSecret=packetfence
defaultRole=gbst-test
group=AIP
SNMPCommunityRead=sh0wme
always_trigger=1
VlanMap=N
registrationRole=registration
defaultAccessList=default
SNMPVersion=2c
RoleMap=Y
description=Aruba Instant Access Points
ExternalPortalEnforcement=Y
guestUrl=http://pf-poc.aws.gbst.net/Aruba::Instant_Access
coaPort=3799
guestRole=test-guest
UrlMap=Y
type=Aruba::Instant_Access
SNMPCommunityTrap=sh0wme
SNMPVersionTrap=2c
cliPwd=SlyF0x.
cliUser=admin
controllerIp=172.28.5.250

#SNMPVersion = 3
#SNMPEngineID = 0000000000000
#SNMPUserNameRead = readUser
#SNMPAuthProtocolRead = MD5
#SNMPAuthPasswordRead = authpwdread
#SNMPPrivProtocolRead = DES
#SNMPPrivPasswordRead = privpwdread
#SNMPUserNameWrite = writeUser
#SNMPAuthProtocolWrite = MD5
#SNMPAuthPasswordWrite = authpwdwrite
#SNMPPrivProtocolWrite = DES
#SNMPPrivPasswordWrite = privpwdwrite
#SNMPVersionTrap = 3
#SNMPUserNameTrap = readUser
#SNMPAuthProtocolTrap = MD5
#SNMPAuthPasswordTrap = authpwdread
#SNMPPrivProtocolTrap = DES
#SNMPPrivPasswordTrap = privpwdread
[192.168.1.0/24]
description=Test Range Switch
type=Cisco::Catalyst_2900XL
mode=production
uplink=23,24
VoIPLLDPDetect=N

[group AIP]
VlanMap=N
radiusSecret=packetfence
always_trigger=1
type=Aruba::Instant_Access
description=Aruba Instant Access Points
defaultRole=gbst-test
guestRole=test-guest
switches.conf


Frame 842: 96 bytes on wire (768 bits), 96 bytes captured (768 bits) on 
interface 0
Ethernet II, Src: JuniperN_fd:9c:01 (54:e0:32:fd:9c:01), Dst: HewlettP_cd:7a:a0 
(b0:b8:67:cd:7a:a0)
Internet Protocol Version 4, Src: 10.11.8.37, Dst: 172.28.5.250
User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: 41134, Dst Port: 3799
    Source Port: 41134
    Destination Port: 3799
    Length: 62
    Checksum: 0xc54f [unverified]
    [Checksum Status: Unverified]
    [Stream index: 34]
    [Timestamps]
RADIUS Protocol
    Code: Disconnect-Request (40)
    Packet identifier: 0x2d (45)
    Length: 54
    Authenticator: a8a602034d97608c81e99f6ea8da338a
    Attribute Value Pairs
        AVP: t=Calling-Station-Id(31) l=14 val=30074d744c55
        AVP: t=NAS-IP-Address(4) l=6 val=172.28.5.250
        AVP: t=User-Name(1) l=14 val=30074d744c55

Frame 843: 191 bytes on wire (1528 bits), 191 bytes captured (1528 bits) on 
interface 0
Ethernet II, Src: HewlettP_cd:7a:a0 (b0:b8:67:cd:7a:a0), Dst: JuniperN_fd:9c:01 
(54:e0:32:fd:9c:01)
Internet Protocol Version 4, Src: 172.28.5.9, Dst: 172.20.96.34
User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: 514, Dst Port: 514
Syslog message: LOCAL1.ERR: Aug 28 10:05:00 2019 172.28.5.9 stm[3795]: <121014> 
<ERRS> <172.28.5.9 B0:B8:67:CD:7A:A0> |aaa| Received invalid reply digest from 
RADIUS server
    1000 1... = Facility: LOCAL1 - reserved for local use (17)
    .... .011 = Level: ERR - error conditions (3)
    Message: Aug 28 10:05:00 2019 172.28.5.9 stm[3795]: <121014> <ERRS> 
<172.28.5.9 B0:B8:67:CD:7A:A0> |aaa| Received invalid reply digest from RADIUS 
server
        Syslog timestamp (RFC3164): Aug 28 10:05:00
        Syslog hostname: 2019
        Syslog process id: 172
        Syslog message id: .28.5.9 stm[3795]: <121014> <ERRS> <172.28.5.9 
B0:B8:67:CD:7A:A0> |aaa| Received invalid reply digest from RADIUS server

Frame 844: 253 bytes on wire (2024 bits), 253 bytes captured (2024 bits) on 
interface 0
Ethernet II, Src: HewlettP_cd:7a:a0 (b0:b8:67:cd:7a:a0), Dst: JuniperN_fd:9c:01 
(54:e0:32:fd:9c:01)
Internet Protocol Version 4, Src: 172.28.5.9, Dst: 172.20.96.34
User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: 514, Dst Port: 514
Syslog message: LOCAL1.ERR: Aug 28 10:05:00 2019 172.28.5.9 stm[3795]: <199802> 
<ERRS> <172.28.5.9 B0:B8:67:CD:7A:A0>  rc_rfc3576_instant.c, 
rc_process_rfc3576_request:99: disconnect packet dropped  10.11.8.37 found for 
disconnect msg
    1000 1... = Facility: LOCAL1 - reserved for local use (17)
    .... .011 = Level: ERR - error conditions (3)
    Message: Aug 28 10:05:00 2019 172.28.5.9 stm[3795]: <199802> <ERRS> 
<172.28.5.9 B0:B8:67:CD:7A:A0>  rc_rfc3576_instant.c, 
rc_process_rfc3576_request:99: disconnect packet dropped  10.11.8.37 found for 
disconnect msg
        Syslog timestamp (RFC3164): Aug 28 10:05:00
        Syslog hostname: 2019
        Syslog process id: 172
        Syslog message id: .28.5.9 stm[3795]: <199802> <ERRS> <172.28.5.9 
B0:B8:67:CD:7A:A0>  rc_rfc3576_instant.c, rc_process_rfc3576_request:99: 
disconnect packet dropped  10.11.8.37 found for disconnect msg




-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolas Quiniou-Briand <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, 27 August 2019 9:51 PM
To: Peter Reissenweber <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] DesAssociating mac on switch

Hello Peter,

On 2019-08-27 7:03 a.m., Peter Reissenweber wrote:
> RADIUS Protocol
>      Code: Disconnect-Request (40)

According to this capture, PacketFence is sending a Disconnect-Request
(40) and not a CoA-Request (43) (see [0] for details)

I saw in your switches.conf that you used:

#v+
deauthMethod=RADIUS
#v-

Leave "Deauthentication method" empty and enable "Use CoA", you should see that 
PF send a CoA-Request to your controller. I hope that will fix your issue.

[0] 
https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2Frfc5176%23section-2&amp;data=02%7C01%7CPeter.Reissenweber%40gbst.com%7Cbb147160780743952c2b08d72ae4c75e%7C1c2da354196b481891e4f760cbaac9e4%7C0%7C0%7C637025034402780880&amp;sdata=uMek83UXI7m0am0uGcX44Q%2BnhKWEU%2BF6K66YV1l8ZdQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
--
Nicolas Quiniou-Briand
[email protected]  ::  +1.514.447.4918 *140  ::  
https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Finverse.ca&amp;data=02%7C01%7CPeter.Reissenweber%40gbst.com%7Cbb147160780743952c2b08d72ae4c75e%7C1c2da354196b481891e4f760cbaac9e4%7C0%7C0%7C637025034402780880&amp;sdata=A93oWOfPn8y%2Byvbub4RFizKK%2BNgS2swtghpjaC93Ky0%3D&amp;reserved=0
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo 
(https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsogo.nu&amp;data=02%7C01%7CPeter.Reissenweber%40gbst.com%7Cbb147160780743952c2b08d72ae4c75e%7C1c2da354196b481891e4f760cbaac9e4%7C0%7C0%7C637025034402780880&amp;sdata=siRUv%2BEmC9KwftZ2awThrDXO7ts1HCf%2FbYkDWZ%2BFAB8%3D&amp;reserved=0),
 PacketFence
(https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpacketfence.org&amp;data=02%7C01%7CPeter.Reissenweber%40gbst.com%7Cbb147160780743952c2b08d72ae4c75e%7C1c2da354196b481891e4f760cbaac9e4%7C0%7C0%7C637025034402780880&amp;sdata=cQaqA6MfjORVa7ZtBmHZERmS0en%2B22aBaR4KZGFCYg4%3D&amp;reserved=0)
 and Fingerbank 
(https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffingerbank.org&amp;data=02%7C01%7CPeter.Reissenweber%40gbst.com%7Cbb147160780743952c2b08d72ae4c75e%7C1c2da354196b481891e4f760cbaac9e4%7C0%7C0%7C637025034402780880&amp;sdata=8%2FOR5%2FzcUpBP%2Fn2AxD46%2F8FlTB0FihnyAqqd6Ue8qG0%3D&amp;reserved=0)
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and / or privileged material that 
may be governed by confidential information provisions contained in the 
agreement between GBST and your company. Any disclosure, copying, distribution, 
or other use without the express consent of the sender is prohibited. If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from 
any computer. All rights in the information transmitted, including copyright, 
are reserved. Nothing in this message should be interpreted as a digital 
signature that can be used to authenticate a document. No warranty is given by 
the sender that any attachments to this email are free from viruses or other 
defects.

_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
  • [PacketFence-users] DesAssoci... Peter Reissenweber via PacketFence-users
    • Re: [PacketFence-users] ... Nicolas Quiniou-Briand via PacketFence-users
      • Re: [PacketFence-use... Peter Reissenweber via PacketFence-users
        • Re: [PacketFence... Peter Reissenweber via PacketFence-users
          • Re: [PacketF... Nicolas Quiniou-Briand via PacketFence-users
            • Re: [Pa... Peter Reissenweber via PacketFence-users
              • Re:... Nicolas Quiniou-Briand via PacketFence-users
                • ... Peter Reissenweber via PacketFence-users
                • ... Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users
                • ... Peter Reissenweber via PacketFence-users
                • ... Nicolas Quiniou-Briand via PacketFence-users
                • ... Peter Reissenweber via PacketFence-users
                • ... Nicolas Quiniou-Briand via PacketFence-users
                • ... Peter Reissenweber via PacketFence-users
                • ... Peter Reissenweber via PacketFence-users
                • ... Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users

Reply via email to