Dear Talan,

Can you provide more details on how you're doing the authentication? Is
this radius with mac-auth on the SSID or are you doing "captive portal" in
the AP itself?

I have PF working fine with ruckus' smartzone (albeit 3.6.1 but I don't
expect any differences with 5.1) but I did have to make a small change in
PF to get it working properly.

I am doing radius in non-proxy mode from the AP directly to PF (so I can't
use radius de-auth and need to use the northbound API for de-auth).

if you can provide some screenshots on how you configured smartzone I can
help you most probably.



On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:09 PM Talan Westby via PacketFence-users <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Thanks for getting back in touch and sorry for the delay.
>
> I have had Ruckus spend some time working with us on this to no avail.
> What they have managed to do is run some RADIUS test from their SmartZone
> controller back to PF which always seem to fail. I would have thought that
> the RADIUS request would have been a MAC request so we have tried putting
> in a MAC Address as the username and the password which always seems to
> fail. This does work when going via our Cisco WLCs, so I guess the Ruckus
> is doing something slightly different. One thing I have noticed is the
> SmartZone.pm file in PF creates a API call to the Ruckus controller and
> when I take that payload and try the request myself the Ruckus controller
> responds with "Bad Request".
>
> At this point I am wondering if Ruckus have updated their API Northbound
> endpoints in their later versions of software, we are running 5.1 which is
> a relatively new piece of software. Could you confirm whether the PF
> integration has been tested with this newer version of controller?
>
> Also could you confirm the process of on boarding a user to PF from a
> Ruckus controller so we can be sure we are investigating the right section?
> To clarify users are being forwarded to the portal and they are able to
> enrol but the Ruckus SmartZone never receives/recognises that PF has
> authorized that user for access. If we could understand what PF does to
> send that authorization then we can concentrate on what might be causing
> the issue.
>
> Thanks,
> Talan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicolas Quiniou-Briand <[email protected]>
> Sent: 23 August 2019 16:16
> To: Talan Westby <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Ruckus SmartZone and PF 9
>
> On 2019-08-23 5:08 p.m., Talan Westby wrote:
> > If you could let me know which logs I should be looking at that would be
> great.
>
> I really don't know which logs.
>
> Did you check on Ruckus documentation ? I found this link [0]
>
> Otherwise, you can try to capture traffic between PacketFence and Ruckus
> Smartzone when a device try to register. If traffic is not encrypted, you
> could have some hint.
>
> [0] /usr/local/pf/addons/packages/build-go.sh build /usr/local/pf
> /usr/local/pf/sbin/
> --
> Nicolas Quiniou-Briand
> [email protected]  ::  +1.514.447.4918 *140  ::  https://inverse.ca Inverse
> inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (https://sogo.nu), PacketFence
> (https://packetfence.org) and Fingerbank (http://fingerbank.org)
> _____________________________________
>
> This electronic message contains information from Derby College which may
> be privileged and confidential.
> The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or
> entity named above.
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure,
> copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is
> prohibited. Internet communications are not secure and therefore Derby
> College does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this
> message. Any views or opinions presented are only those of the author and
> not those of Derby College.
>
> If you have received this message in error, please reply to this message
> and include [email protected] immediately.
> _________________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to