Hello David,
what you can do instead of using a dhcp-listener interface is to use the
dhcp sensor
(https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/blob/devel/docs/PacketFence_Installation_Guide.asciidoc#dhcp-remote-sensor).
Also for the "Missing mandatory element ip or netmask on interface
eth4.7 at /usr/local/pf/lib/pfconfig/namespaces/interfaces.pm line 107."
i just pushed a patch and you will be able to apply it by launching
pf-maint.pl
Regards
Fabrice
Le 19-09-19 à 07 h 34, David Harvey via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Anybody else had to deal with a similar situation?
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 4:06 PM David Harvey <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Dear Packetfencers,
I've finally taken the plunge on version 9 and it's looking great!
Hoping you may be able to advise on the following.
Previously I followed some advice for 8.3 for dhcp sniffing which
was largely:
Make a promiscuous or static interface for relevant vlans with no
iP set (setting IP resulted in routes coming up which were not
desired)
Add as type dhcp-listener in pf.conf;
Since upgrading to 9, it appears this is no longer an acceptable
config:
"Missing mandatory element ip or netmask on interface eth4.7 at
/usr/local/pf/lib/pfconfig/namespaces/interfaces.pm
<http://interfaces.pm> line 107."
Has the advised methodology changed?
I should note this was required as our dhcp runs from a switch and
has direct VLAN access, so dhcp helpers/forwarders cannot be used
effectively.
Many thanks as always,
David
--
David Harvey
Director of Internal Technology, Thought Machine
Data Classification:Private
*Email*: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Web*: www.thoughtmachine.net <http://www.thoughtmachine.net/>
Thought Machine Group a limited company registered in England & Wales.
Registered number: 11114277.
Registered Office: 5 New Street Square, London EC4A 3TW
<https://maps.google.com/?q=5+New+Street+Square,+London+EC4A+3TW&entry=gmail&source=g>.
The content of this email is confidential and intended for the
recipient specified in message only. It is strictly forbidden to share
any part of this message with any third party, without a written
consent of the sender. If you received this message by mistake, please
reply to this message and follow with its deletion, so that we can
ensure such a mistake does not occur in the future.
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
--
Fabrice Durand
[email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 (x135) :: www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
(http://packetfence.org)
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
