Hello Guy,
the better solution is to take a backup of the db and keep the
configuration files.
Then install a debian 9 , apply the configuration, import the db then
apply the change to the schema then it should work.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 19-10-29 à 13 h 52, Guy BLAVIN via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Ok, I have been investigating further. Packetfence 9.0 is not
supported on debian 8, but packetfence 8.3.0 is not available any more
in debian 9 repository.
I tried to do an upgrade of the os from debian 8 to 9 but packetfence
doesn't work anymore (no mariadb).
Also, I can't install a fresh debian 9, with a fresh packetfence
8.3.0, then restore my backup on it, then upgrade.
_I really don't see how to upgrade from packetfence 8.3.0 on debian 8
to packetfence 9.1.0 on debian 9 in any other way than doing a fresh
install and reconfigure everything from scratch._
I really would like my questions answered, or a real communication
done on the webside to _tell people that the support for debian is
experimental_.
I only found this information:
https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/issues/2460
Upgrading from a version prior to 9.0.0
Support for Debian 8 dropped
Debian 8 will not be supported anymore for versions 9.0.0 and above.
You should instead use Debian 9 now as it is currently the only
supported Debian version.
Le 28/10/2019 à 09:57, Guy BLAVIN via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Hello,
Any idea on this ?
Guy
Le 22/10/2019 à 18:00, Guy BLAVIN via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Hello Fabrice,
I tried to do an update, but the inverse.ca repository doesn't give a
newer version (8.3.0 max on debian jessie).
Any idea when v9.0 or v9.1 will be available in this repository ?
Thank you,
Guy Blavin
Le 12/10/2019 à 03:01, Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Hello Guy,
Le 19-10-09 à 11 h 29, Guy BLAVIN via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Hello all,
On a 8.3.0 packetfence cluster of three nodes on debian 8.11 I have a
lot of logs about Fingerbank but I don't use it, there is no API key and
I read that it means it should be disabled.
On the web services pages the service "fingerbank-collector" is
grayed out.
The logs that pfqueue tries to connect to 127.0.0.1:4723
Oct 9 17:18:05 PBRZNETIS005 pfqueue: pfqueue(21651) ERROR:
[mac:unknown] Error while communicating with the Fingerbank collector.
500 Can't connect to 127.0.0.1:4723
(pf::fingerbank::endpoint_attributes)
Oct 9 17:18:05 PBRZNETIS005 pfqueue: pfqueue(21651) ERROR:
[mac:unknown] Unable to fetch query arguments for Fingerbank query.
Aborting. (pf::fingerbank::process)
Oct 9 17:18:06 PBRZNETIS005 pfqueue: pfqueue(21355) ERROR:
[mac:unknown] Error while communicating with the Fingerbank collector.
500 Can't connect to 127.0.0.1:4723
(pf::fingerbank::endpoint_attributes)
Oct 9 17:18:06 PBRZNETIS005 pfqueue: pfqueue(21355) ERROR:
[mac:unknown] Unable to fetch query arguments for Fingerbank query.
Aborting. (pf::fingerbank::process)
Oct 9 17:18:21 PBRZNETIS005 pfqueue: pfqueue(21657) ERROR:
[mac:unknown] Error while communicating with the Fingerbank collector.
500 Can't connect to 127.0.0.1:4723
(pf::fingerbank::endpoint_attributes)
Oct 9 17:18:21 PBRZNETIS005 pfqueue: pfqueue(21657) ERROR:
[mac:unknown] Unable to fetch query arguments for Fingerbank query.
Aborting. (pf::fingerbank::process)
What could I do to stop pfqueue from trying or any other thing that
could resolve this issue ?
You can't really disable that.
I have read quite a lot of older answers in the list, they mostly advise
to restart some specific services; I did a pfcmd pf service restart
successively on each node of the cluster, to no avail...
Also, I still have this problem with the dashboard showing "what's going
on?" on most of the graphs, and some servers and services are displayed
as failed but at the same time the cluster state page says otherwise and
they are actually all available. What could I do ? Would it be advisable
to upgrade to another version (even if I have tried to install the exact
same versions in a lab and I don't have these issues ?).
I recommand you to upgrade, this is some issues that have been fixed.
Regards
Fabrice
Thx for the help.
Guy
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
