Hi Fabrice,

I have another question for you.
How does PF choose which connection profile to use? We have 3 defined.
1) default which comes with the system.
2) sc-eduroam for local users
3) non-sc-eduroam for visitors.

Best,

Nadim

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 10:42 PM Nadim El-Khoury <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Fabrice,
>
> I want to thank you for taking the time to look into the log file.
> Yes, we have AD configured as an authentication source. I added it to the
> source in the connection profile and will test it in the morning and report
> back.
>
> Best,
>
> Nadim
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 8:31 PM Durand fabrice <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hello Nadim,
>>
>> here what happen:
>>
>> Feb 10 13:15:08 fennec packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(15955) INFO:
>> [mac:a4:e9:75:4e:95:5d] handling radius autz request: from switch_ip =>
>> (10.2.75.11), connection_type => Wireless-802.11-EAP,switch_mac =>
>> (5c:5b:35:a8:10:33), mac => [a4:e9:75:4e:95:5d], port => 0, username =>
>> "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
>> ssid => eduroam (pf::radius::authorize)
>> Feb 10 13:15:08 fennec packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(15955) INFO:
>> [mac:a4:e9:75:4e:95:5d] Instantiate profile non-sc-eduroam-users
>> (pf::Connection::ProfileFactory::_from_profile)
>> Feb 10 13:15:08 fennec packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(15955) INFO:
>> [mac:a4:e9:75:4e:95:5d] Found authentication source(s) : '' for realm '
>> springfieldcollege.edu' (pf::config::util::filter_authentication_sources)
>> Feb 10 13:15:08 fennec packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(15955) WARN:
>> [mac:a4:e9:75:4e:95:5d] No category computed for autoreg
>> (pf::role::getNodeInfoForAutoReg)
>> Feb 10 13:15:08 fennec packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(15955) WARN:
>> [mac:a4:e9:75:4e:95:5d] Switch type 'pf::Switch::Generic' does not support
>> MABFloatingDevices (pf::SwitchSupports::__ANON__)
>> Feb 10 13:15:08 fennec packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(15955) INFO:
>> [mac:a4:e9:75:4e:95:5d] Found authentication source(s) : '' for realm '
>> springfieldcollege.edu' (pf::config::util::filter_authentication_sources)
>>
>> PacketFence instantiate the profile non-sc-eduroam-users but is not able
>> to find any sources to compute the rules.
>>
>> My assumption is that you enabled auto registration on the connection
>> profile but you didn't defined any sources.
>>
>> So edit the connection profile and assign an authentication source on it
>> (you probably  have an AD one).
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Fabrice
>>
>>
>> Le 20-02-10 à 14 h 34, Nadim El-Khoury a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Fabrice,
>>
>> Please find attached the packetfence.log file.
>> The username is [email protected]
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Nadim
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 10:09 PM Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Nadim
>>> Le 20-02-05 à 02 h 19, Nadim El-Khoury via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> It does not look like that PF 9.3.0 is able to assign the right
>>> connection profile once a user is authenticated.
>>>
>>> Question 1) Why is the right connection profile not being picked up
>>> based on the created filter?
>>>
>>> probably a wrong filter
>>>
>>> Question 2) Can the default connection profile be disabled?
>>>
>>> no
>>>
>>> Question 3) Why is the system not entering the right owner for the
>>> registered device after successful authentication?
>>>
>>> No profile , so no source, so no user.
>>>
>>> Question 4) Why is the connection profile is set to N/A when it does not
>>> properly match a profile?
>>>
>>> because packetfence is not able to compute the connection profile.
>>>
>>>
>>> When running the /usr/local/pf/bin/pftest authentication username ""
>>> The command returns the right AD group the user is part of.
>>>
>>> Recomputing of roles does not seem to be working if a device is
>>> successfully registered with another user or owner. So, if a new user uses
>>> the same device the role is not recomputed and the new user using the same
>>> old registered device ends up with the same previous role as the previous
>>> user.
>>>
>>> Question 1) How can we change the above behavior?
>>>
>>> share your packetfence.log file when the device connect and we will have
>>> the answer.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Fabrice
>>>
>>>
>>> Your help is very much appreciated.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Nadim
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PacketFence-users mailing 
>>> [email protected]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>
>>
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to