Ive got the same problem (previously posted) without solving it yet.. pftest 
works as expected but real world only gets auth but no role..

Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
________________________________
From: Christian Sudec via PacketFence-users 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 5:19:26 PM
To: Ludovic Zammit <[email protected]>
Cc: Christian Sudec <[email protected]>; 
[email protected] 
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Aruba AP and VLAN Mapping - Addition

Hi again!

I ran 'pftest authentication Testy Testpwd' and these are the results:

Authenticating against 'HTL_AD' in context 'admin'
   Authentication SUCCEEDED against HTL_AD (Authentication successful.)
   Matched against HTL_AD for 'authentication' rule Teachers
     set_role : Teacher
     set_access_duration : 1D
   Did not match against HTL_AD for 'administration' rules

Authenticating against 'HTL_AD' in context 'portal'
   Authentication SUCCEEDED against HTL_AD (Authentication successful.)
   Matched against HTL_AD for 'authentication' rule Teachers
     set_role : Teacher
     set_access_duration : 1D
   Did not match against HTL_AD for 'administration' rules

So I get the preferred role, but as stated in the logs and in 'Auditing'
I didn't get it...
???

regards
Chris

On 10.03.2020 16:09, Ludovic Zammit wrote:
> Ok, so if you are doing 802.1x then most of the time you do
> auto-registration where you don’t display the captive portal.
>
> In that case, your access would be computed on the fly. Do that and
> remove device info:
>
> grep MAC_ADDRESS /usr/local/pf/logs/packetfence.log
>
> My guess is that you don’t match or get the VLAN for the proper role.
> Check for the auto register option on the connection profile.
>
> Thanks,
> Ludovic Zammit
> [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>  ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x145) 
> ::www.inverse.ca
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
> (http://packetfence.org)
>
>
>
>
>> On Mar 10, 2020, at 11:04 AM, Christian Sudec <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Ludovic!
>>
>>
>> On 10.03.2020 14:42, Ludovic Zammit wrote:
>>> Hello Christian,
>>>
>>> Are you doing VLAN enforcement or Role enforcement ?
>> We're doing only 'RADIUS Enforcement' as this is the requirement for
>> 802.1x (both
>> wireless and wired).
>>
>>> On Aruba you have to do one of them, not both at the same time.
>> What do you mean? When doing 802.1x packetfence uses the the username
>> and password
>> with its authentication rules to determine the role (eg.
>> teacher/pupil), which is used in the
>> switch-profile with "Role mapping by VLAN ID" to provide the correct
>> VLAN (772/773).
>>
>>> How are you redirected on the captive portal ? By a radius request ?
>> There ist no captive portal, because no guests are allowed.
>>
>>> Once you get authenticated PF sends a radius disconnect message to
>>> the AP to kick your Mac address out for the client to reconnect
>>> immediately and get the production vlan/role
>> That's my question: there is no Tunnel-Private-Group-ID and no
>> disconnect message. How and where do
>> I set/debug these?
>>
>>> Check the logs/packetfence.log for your Mac address the activity and
>>> see if you can find any error.
>> Nothing useful (at least for me) in there:
>> Mar 10 12:10:22 ippf auth[1659]: (14606)   Login OK: [Testy] (from
>> client 10.71.100.63/32 port 0 cli bc:d1:d3:31:13:78 via TLS tunnel)
>> Mar 10 12:10:22 ippf auth[1659]: [mac:bc:d1:d3:31:13:78] Accepted
>> user: Testy and returned VLAN
>> Mar 10 12:10:22 ippf auth[1659]: (14607) Login OK: [Testy] (from
>> client 10.71.100.63/32 port 0 cli bc:d1:d3:31:13:78)
>>
>> As you can see: returned VLAN - but I don't get one...
>>
>> kind regards
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ludovic Zammit
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>  <mailto:[email protected]>  ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x145)
>>> ::www.inverse.ca <http://www.inverse.ca>
>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and
>>> PacketFence (http://packetfence.org)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Mar 10, 2020, at 8:00 AM, Christian Sudec via PacketFence-users
>>>> <[email protected]
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi everybody!
>>>>
>>>> First the current situation so far:
>>>>
>>>> We installed a test-network, where the packetfence-server is
>>>> reachable with an ip 10.5.1.4 (type management)
>>>> and set 'RADIUS enforcement' as chosen method.
>>>>
>>>> Next we installed a Mikrotik-Switch (POE) with 4 VLANS (771-774)
>>>> and attached an Aruba-AP to a trunk port
>>>> with the mentioned VLANs. The default VLAN is 771 and the AP gets
>>>> an IP and can connect to the pf-server.
>>>>
>>>> Now we created an authentication-source to our AD and created a
>>>> switch-template for the AP. There are two
>>>> roles based on AD-group-membership: teachers (VID 772) and pupils
>>>> (VID 773) - set in the switch profile under
>>>> 'Role mapping by VLAN ID'.
>>>>
>>>> As far as it was possible, we set up the AP according to the
>>>> packetfence device configuration guide, because
>>>> the guide refers to ArubaOS 5.x, but we are already at 8.6.0.2.
>>>>
>>>> Now we are stuck: everybody can login with an ad-username (and
>>>> pasword), but the user doesn't get
>>>> transferred to the correct vlan and stays in the default. In
>>>> 'Auditing' I can see at 'Node Information' the
>>>> Role N/A and there is no Tunnel-Private-Group-ID in the RADIUS Reply.
>>>>
>>>> Can somebody enlighten me on what to check or what to set / how to
>>>> debug?
>>>>
>>>> kind regards
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>
>>
>



_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
  • [PacketFence-users] Ar... Christian Sudec via PacketFence-users
    • Re: [PacketFence-... Ludovic Zammit via PacketFence-users
      • Re: [PacketFe... Christian Sudec via PacketFence-users
        • Re: [Pack... Ludovic Zammit via PacketFence-users
          • Re: [... Christian Sudec via PacketFence-users
            • ... Ludovic Zammit via PacketFence-users
              • ... Ludovic Zammit via PacketFence-users
                • ... Christian Sudec via PacketFence-users
                • ... Ludovic Zammit via PacketFence-users
                • ... Christian Sudec via PacketFence-users
            • ... Fetakungen Virtual Adventurer via PacketFence-users
            • ... Gregor Fajdiga via PacketFence-users
          • Re: [... Christian Sudec via PacketFence-users
            • ... Zacharry Williams via PacketFence-users
              • ... Christian Sudec via PacketFence-users

Reply via email to