Gentlemen,
There is another question that I don't know why, when I tested with a
machine outside the domain it was possible to authenticate by 802.1x by
inserting domain login and password, there is no problem but the self
registration domain node does not work. It doesn't make sense to me.
Em seg., 23 de mar. de 2020 às 16:26, Wagner Liegio <wagner.lie...@gmail.com>
escreveu:
> Dear,
>
> Come on today I have version 8 running with auto registration working
> normally, I am wanting to deploy the newer version but it is not being
> possible because, there is this error of the auto registration, the
> parameters are the same as the packetfence 8 nothing changes unless the
> version.
> Please help me, I don't know what to do. Tell me what you need and I will
> make the files available for analysis and testing. I ask you to do the
> tests in this new version, please see what I'm saying, unfortunately it's
> not working.
>
> Em seg., 23 de mar. de 2020 às 16:21, Wagner Liegio <
> wagner.lie...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> Dear,
>>
>> There is a serious problem in the versions of packetfence, because one
>> works in a normal way and the others should come with more functions and
>> bug fixes, but it does not come with another type of problem that even the
>> support is not understanding, the logs are confusing because it shows an
>> error in the database when inserting a node, then it shows an
>> authentication error, another one shows an error that it was not possible
>> to search the ldap table, anyway I am 15 days trying to run a version that
>> just came out of the oven, but it is not being possible because nobody
>> knows how to solve the problem. My question is: did packetfence come to be
>> a security tool or a problem tool?
>>
>> Em seg., 23 de mar. de 2020 às 16:16, Wagner Liegio <
>> wagner.lie...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>>
>>> Fabrice,
>>>
>>> Excuse me, but if I were to hear that I would not have contacted the
>>> mailing list support. There is a problem with packetfence 9.3 linked to the
>>> domain that it does not recognize users and computers. So much so that
>>> there is a problem that by inserting the node manually it manages to search
>>> for the user and authenticate the node.
>>>
>>> Em seg., 23 de mar. de 2020 às 15:42, Fabrice Durand <fdur...@inverse.ca>
>>> escreveu:
>>>
>>>> Hello Wagner,
>>>>
>>>> so it mean that there is no user with the attribute sAMAccountName=iran
>>>> in OU=Usuarios,OU=Tabajara Sede,DC=tabajara,DC=com,DC=br
>>>>
>>>> So if there is no user then there is no role returned.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Fabrice
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 20-03-23 à 14 h 13, Wagner Liegio a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Fabrice,
>>>>
>>>> Below is the return of the command:
>>>>
>>>> version: 1
>>>>
>>>> #
>>>> # LDAPv3
>>>> # base <OU=Usuarios,OU=Tabajara Sede,DC=tabajara,DC=com,DC=br> with
>>>> scope subtree
>>>> # filter: sAMAccountName=iran
>>>> # requesting: ALL
>>>> #
>>>>
>>>> # search result
>>>>
>>>> # numResponses: 1
>>>>
>>>> I want to inform you that I will perform the same procedure in
>>>> packtefence 8, which has self-registration enabled and working, the output
>>>> of the command was the same.
>>>>
>>>> Em seg., 23 de mar. de 2020 às 11:48, Fabrice Durand <
>>>> fdur...@inverse.ca> escreveu:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello Wagner,
>>>>>
>>>>> do the search with sAMAccountName=iran not sAMAccountName = packetfence
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Fabrice
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 20-03-23 à 10 h 45, Wagner Liegio a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>> Good morning Fabrice,
>>>>>
>>>>> Follows return of the informed command:
>>>>>
>>>>> version: 1
>>>>>
>>>>> #
>>>>> # LDAPv3
>>>>> # base <OU = Users, OU = Tabajara Headquarters, DC = tabajara, DC =
>>>>> com, DC = br> with scope subtree
>>>>> # filter: sAMAccountName = packetfence
>>>>> # requesting: ALL
>>>>> #
>>>>>
>>>>> # packetfence, PacketFence, Service, Users, Tabajara Headquarters,
>>>>> tabajara.com.br
>>>>> dn: CN = packetfence, OU = PacketFence, OU = Service, OU = Users, OU =
>>>>> Tabajara Sede, DC = taba
>>>>> jara, DC = com, DC = br
>>>>> objectClass: top
>>>>> objectClass: person
>>>>> objectClass: organizationalPerson
>>>>> objectClass: user
>>>>> cn: packetfence
>>>>> givenName: packetfence
>>>>> distinguishedName: CN = packetfence, OU = PacketFence, OU = Service,
>>>>> OU = Users, OU = Table
>>>>> jara Headquarters, DC = tabajara, DC = com, DC = br
>>>>> instanceType: 4
>>>>> whenCreated: 20190522175834.0Z
>>>>> whenChanged: 20200314212343.0Z
>>>>> displayName: packetfence
>>>>> uSNCreated: 332707737
>>>>> memberOf: CN = Domain Admins, CN = Users, DC = tabajara, DC = com, DC
>>>>> = us
>>>>> uSNChanged: 354881720
>>>>> name: packetfence
>>>>> objectGUID :: Gtp8SctV30ObE156O9onWA ==
>>>>> userAccountControl: 66048
>>>>> badPwdCount: 0
>>>>> codePage: 0
>>>>> countryCode: 0
>>>>> badPasswordTime: 134565121389590252
>>>>> lastLogon: 133465121436547757
>>>>> pwdLastSet: 132030215143488213
>>>>> primaryGroupID: 513
>>>>> objectSid :: AQUAAAAAAAUVAAAAOEkycmN9EhxnEvQ3io7GNA ==
>>>>> adminCount: 1
>>>>> accountExpires: 9223372036854775807
>>>>> logonCount: 0
>>>>> sAMAccountName: packetfence
>>>>> sAMAccountType: 805306368
>>>>> userPrincipalName: packetfe...@tabajara.com.br
>>>>> objectCategory: CN = Person, CN = Schema, CN = Configuration, DC =
>>>>> tabajara, DC = com, DC = us
>>>>> dSCorePropagationData: 16010101000000.0Z
>>>>> mS-DS-ConsistencyGuid :: Gtp8SctV30ObE156O9onWA ==
>>>>> lastLogonTimestamp: 132286946239647914
>>>>>
>>>>> # search result
>>>>>
>>>>> # numResponses: 2
>>>>> # numEntries: 1
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>
>>>>> Wagner
>>>>>
>>>>> Em qui., 19 de mar. de 2020 às 23:45, Durand fabrice <
>>>>> fdur...@inverse.ca> escreveu:
>>>>>
>>>>>> If you stripped in radius in the realm ANA, it mean that packetfence
>>>>>> is doing a ldap search with sAMAccountName=iran
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So try that from the cli:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ldapsearch -h 10.10.10.70 -s sub -b "OU=Usuarios,OU=Tabajara
>>>>>> Sede,DC=tabajara,DC=com,DC=br" -D
>>>>>> "CN=packetfence,OU=PacketFence,OU=Servico,OU=Usuarios,OU=Tabajara
>>>>>> Sede,DC=tabajara,DC=com,DC=br" -w whatyouarelookingfor -L
>>>>>> "sAMAccountName=iran"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and see if it return something.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fabrice
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 20-03-19 à 14 h 42, Wagner Liegio a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good afternoon,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I made the suggested adjustments by activating the strip in radius,
>>>>>> created a new realm, and the error persists. User authentication
>>>>>> searching
>>>>>> for the domain only works, manually registering the node in the
>>>>>> packetfence. Therefore, the error still remains in the database when
>>>>>> trying
>>>>>> to register auto.
>>>>>> Below is the database error log:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mar 19 18:15:11 aplpcktfpdin01 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(6759)
>>>>>> INFO: [mac:d0:94:66:db:ae:77] handling radius autz request: from
>>>>>> switch_ip
>>>>>> => (10.95.10.1), connection_type => Ethernet-EAP,switch_mac =>
>>>>>> (c8:0c:c8:f1:25:20), mac => [d0:94:66:db:ae:77], port => 78774, username
>>>>>> =>
>>>>>> "ANA\iran" (pf::radius::authorize)
>>>>>> Mar 19 18:15:11 aplpcktfpdin01 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(6759)
>>>>>> INFO: [mac:d0:94:66:db:ae:77] Instantiate profile 802.1x
>>>>>> (pf::Connection::ProfileFactory::_from_profile)
>>>>>> Mar 19 18:15:11 aplpcktfpdin01 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(6759)
>>>>>> INFO: [mac:d0:94:66:db:ae:77] Found authentication source(s) : 'Ana' for
>>>>>> realm 'default' (pf::config::util::filter_authentication_sources)
>>>>>> Mar 19 18:15:11 aplpcktfpdin01 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(6759)
>>>>>> INFO: [mac:d0:94:66:db:ae:77] Using sources Ana for matching
>>>>>> (pf::authentication::match2)
>>>>>> Mar 19 18:15:11 aplpcktfpdin01 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(6759)
>>>>>> INFO: [mac:d0:94:66:db:ae:77] LDAP testing connection
>>>>>> (pf::LDAP::expire_if)
>>>>>> Mar 19 18:15:11 aplpcktfpdin01 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(6759)
>>>>>> WARN: [mac:d0:94:66:db:ae:77] No category computed for autoreg
>>>>>> (pf::role::getNodeInfoForAutoReg)
>>>>>> Mar 19 18:15:11 aplpcktfpdin01 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(6759)
>>>>>> WARN: [mac:d0:94:66:db:ae:77] No role specified or found for pid ANA\iran
>>>>>> (MAC d0:94:66:db:ae:77); assume maximum number of registered nodes is
>>>>>> reached (pf::node::is_max_reg_nodes_reached)
>>>>>> Mar 19 18:15:11 aplpcktfpdin01 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(6759)
>>>>>> ERROR: [mac:d0:94:66:db:ae:77] max nodes per pid met or exceeded -
>>>>>> registration of d0:94:66:db:ae:77 to ANA\iran failed
>>>>>> (pf::registration::setup_node_for_registration)
>>>>>> Mar 19 18:15:11 aplpcktfpdin01 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(6759)
>>>>>> ERROR: [mac:d0:94:66:db:ae:77] auto-registration of node failed max nodes
>>>>>> per pid met or exceeded (pf::radius::authorize)
>>>>>> Mar 19 18:15:11 aplpcktfpdin01 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(6759)
>>>>>> ERROR: [mac:d0:94:66:db:ae:77] Database query failed with non retryable
>>>>>> error: Cannot add or update a child row: a foreign key constraint fails
>>>>>> (`pf`.`node`, CONSTRAINT `0_57` FOREIGN KEY (`tenant_id`, `pid`)
>>>>>> REFERENCES
>>>>>> `person` (`tenant_id`, `pid`) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE)
>>>>>> (errno:
>>>>>> 1452) [INSERT INTO `node` ( `autoreg`, `bandwidth_balance`,
>>>>>> `bypass_role_id`, `bypass_vlan`, `category_id`, `computername`,
>>>>>> `detect_date`, `device_class`, `device_manufacturer`, `device_score`,
>>>>>> `device_type`, `device_version`, `dhcp6_enterprise`, `dhcp6_fingerprint`,
>>>>>> `dhcp_fingerprint`, `dhcp_vendor`, `last_arp`, `last_dhcp`, `last_seen`,
>>>>>> `lastskip`, `mac`, `machine_account`, `notes`, `pid`, `regdate`,
>>>>>> `sessionid`, `status`, `tenant_id`, `time_balance`, `unregdate`,
>>>>>> `user_agent`, `voip`) VALUES ( ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?,
>>>>>> ?,
>>>>>> ?, ?, ?, NOW(), ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ? ) ON DUPLICATE KEY
>>>>>> UPDATE `autoreg` = ?, `last_seen` = NOW(), `pid` = ?, `status` = ?,
>>>>>> `tenant_id` = ?]{yes, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, 2020-03-19 18:15:11,
>>>>>> NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0000-00-00
>>>>>> 00:00:00,
>>>>>> 0000-00-00 00:00:00, 0000-00-00 00:00:00, d0:94:66:db:ae:77, NULL, NULL,
>>>>>> ANA\iran, 0000-00-00 00:00:00, NULL, reg, 1, NULL, 0000-00-00 00:00:00,
>>>>>> NULL, no, yes, ANA\iran, reg, 1} (pf::dal::db_execute)
>>>>>> Mar 19 18:15:11 aplpcktfpdin01 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(6759)
>>>>>> ERROR: [mac:d0:94:66:db:ae:77] Cannot save d0:94:66:db:ae:77 error (500)
>>>>>> (pf::radius::authorize)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Em qua., 18 de mar. de 2020 às 21:34, Durand fabrice via
>>>>>> PacketFence-users <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> escreveu:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Try that:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> pftest authentication ANA\pereira ""
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> pftest authentication pereira ""
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> to see if the user is found and if it match a rule.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If the second one works then in the ANA realm enable strip in radius.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fabrice
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Le 20-03-18 à 20 h 13, Zacharry Williams via PacketFence-users a
>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gonna take a wild guess here, in your realms config turn on strip
>>>>>>> radius for null and your domain and and try logging on with just your
>>>>>>> username and password. I'm guessing your realms config isn't matching.
>>>>>>> For
>>>>>>> us we had three domains and we had to add them all. For example
>>>>>>> COMPANY.ORG, COMPANY.LAN, COMPANY.COM.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020, 12:43 PM Wagner Liegio via PacketFence-users <
>>>>>>> packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Good afternoon,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Follow the requested files attached.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Em ter., 17 de mar. de 2020 às 14:16, Ludovic Zammit <
>>>>>>>> lzam...@inverse.ca> escreveu:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Could you post the result fo those two commands:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> cat /usr/local/pf/conf/authentication.conf
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> cat /usr/local/pf/conf/profiles.conf
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> remove your informations.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ludovic zammitlzam...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x145) ::
>>>>>>>>> www.inverse.ca
>>>>>>>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and
>>>>>>>>> PacketFence (http://packetfence.org)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 2020, at 9:42 AM, Wagner Liegio via PacketFence-users <
>>>>>>>>> packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Good Morning,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The rules, functions are standard on the Zen packetfence 9.3 that
>>>>>>>>> I downloaded from the site, I will send some images of how the
>>>>>>>>> configuration is through the webgui, so I noticed everything is
>>>>>>>>> correct,
>>>>>>>>> what is happening is that the function and the rule is not being
>>>>>>>>> applied
>>>>>>>>> for some reason that I don't know.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <image.png>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <image.png>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <image.png>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Em ter., 17 de mar. de 2020 às 00:04, Zacharry Williams via
>>>>>>>>> PacketFence-users <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>>>>>>>> escreveu:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Check and make sure your realms are defined also.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020, 4:58 PM Brandt Winchell via
>>>>>>>>>> PacketFence-users <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I know when I ran into this issue, it had to do with the
>>>>>>>>>>> authorization source for AD. In the source, I had an
>>>>>>>>>>> authentication rule
>>>>>>>>>>> that matched the sAMAccountName is member of “group name”. The
>>>>>>>>>>> group name
>>>>>>>>>>> must be the AD DN (distinguished name) of the group. CN=%security
>>>>>>>>>>> group
>>>>>>>>>>> you want%,OU=%OU the object resides in%,DC=%your domain%,DC=%domain
>>>>>>>>>>> suffix%
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* Wagner Liegio via PacketFence-users <
>>>>>>>>>>> packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, March 16, 2020 1:08 PM
>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>>>>> *Cc:* Wagner Liegio <wagner.lie...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* [PacketFence-users] authentication sources
>>>>>>>>>>> packetfence 9.3
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Good afternoon, I'm facing the same problem only in version 9.3.
>>>>>>>>>>> I have done everything I can think of, reconfigured the domain, the
>>>>>>>>>>> connection profile, checked the rules and functions. The error
>>>>>>>>>>> follows: No
>>>>>>>>>>> role specified or found for pid ANA \ pereira (MAC d0: 94: 66: db:
>>>>>>>>>>> ee: 7d);
>>>>>>>>>>> assumes maximum number of registered nodes is reached (pf :: node ::
>>>>>>>>>>> is_max_reg_nodes_reached)
>>>>>>>>>>> plpcktfpdin01 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa (9837) ERROR:
>>>>>>>>>>> [mac: d0: 94: 66: db: ee: 7d] max nodes per pid met or exceeded -
>>>>>>>>>>> registration of d0: 94: 66: db: ae: 7d to ANA \ pereira failed
>>>>>>>>>>> (pf :: registration :: setup_node_for_registration)
>>>>>>>>>>> plpcktfpdin01 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa (9837) ERROR:
>>>>>>>>>>> [mac: d0: 94: 66: db: ee: 7d] auto-registration of node failed max
>>>>>>>>>>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>>> per pid met or exceeded (pf :: radius :: authorize)
>>>>>>>>>>> plpcktfpdin01 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa (9837) ERROR:
>>>>>>>>>>> [mac: d0: 94: 66: db: ee: 7d] Database query failed with non
>>>>>>>>>>> retryable
>>>>>>>>>>> error: Cannot add or update a child row: a foreign key constraint
>>>>>>>>>>> fails
>>>>>>>>>>> (pf.node, CONSTRAINT 0_57 FOREIGN KEY (tenant_id, pid)
>>>>>>>>>>> REFERENCES person (tenant_id, pid) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE
>>>>>>>>>>> CASCADE)
>>>>>>>>>>> (errno: 1452) [INSERT INTO node
>>>>>>>>>>> (autoreg, bandwidth_balance, bypass_role_id, bypass_vlan,
>>>>>>>>>>> category_id, computername, detect_date, device_class,
>>>>>>>>>>> device_manufacturer,
>>>>>>>>>>> device_score, device_type,
>>>>>>>>>>> device_version, dhcp6_enterprise, dhcp6_fingerprint,
>>>>>>>>>>> dhcp_fingerprint, dhcp_vendor, last_arp, last_dhcp, last_seen,
>>>>>>>>>>> lastskip,
>>>>>>>>>>> mac, machine_account, notes, regdate, sessionid, status, tenant_id,
>>>>>>>>>>> time_balance, void, user? ?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?, NOW
>>>>>>>>>>> (),?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?, ?,?,?,?) ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE autoreg = ?,
>>>>>>>>>>> Last_seen = NOW (), pid = ?, Status = ?, Tenant_id` =?] {Yes, NULL,
>>>>>>>>>>> NULL,
>>>>>>>>>>> NULL, NULL, NULL, 2020 - 03-13 19:08:50, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
>>>>>>>>>>> NULL,
>>>>>>>>>>> NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
>>>>>>>>>>> 0000-00-00 00:00:00, 0000-00-00 00:00:00, 0000-00-00 00:00:00,
>>>>>>>>>>> d0: 94: 66: db: ae: 7d, NULL, NULL, ANA \ pereira, 0000-00-00
>>>>>>>>>>> 00:00:00,
>>>>>>>>>>> NULL, reg, 1, NULL, 0000-00-00 00:00:00, NULL, no, yes, ANA \
>>>>>>>>>>> pereira, reg,
>>>>>>>>>>> 1}
>>>>>>>>>>> (pf :: dal :: db_execute)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>>>>>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> PacketFence-users mailing
>>>>>>> listPacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>>>>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>> Fabrice durandfdur...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::
>>>>> www.inverse.ca
>>>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
>>>>> (http://packetfence.org)
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>> Fabrice durandfdur...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::
>>>> www.inverse.ca
>>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
>>>> (http://packetfence.org)
>>>>
>>>>
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
