This is indeed the built-in admin account. (See the issue I opened up here
https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/issues/5919).

This is really a pretty basic cluster setup atm, only doing radius
enforcement. Nothing else.

Under the admin user, actions = ALL

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 11:30 AM Ludovic Zammit via PacketFence-users <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> What is the account that you have issue with ? Is that admin ? If it’s
> local account, send a screen capture of the rights under Action.
>
> Send the output of your conf/authentication.conf hide personal infos.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Ludovic [email protected] ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x145) ::  www.inverse.ca
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
> (http://packetfence.org)
>
>
>
>
>
> On Oct 21, 2020, at 11:40 PM, Christian McDonald <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Any other things to try? I’m following the upgrade procedure exactly.
> Thanks.
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:40 AM Ludovic Zammit via PacketFence-users <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Have you tried that:
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/blob/devel/UPGRADE.asciidoc#rename-pfmon-actions-to-pfcron
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Ludovic [email protected] ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x145) ::  
>> www.inverse.ca
>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
>> (http://packetfence.org)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 16, 2020, at 4:57 PM, Christian McDonald via PacketFence-users <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Starting with a healthy 3 node 10.1 cluster, patched using ./pf-maint.pl
>> and freshly rebooted. Galera health, etc.
>>
>> A few observations:
>>
>>
>>    1. I get a PFCRON_READ Administrative Role error when browsing
>>    Configuration > Maintenance as the built-in admin user. I understand there
>>    were significant changes to the PFMON/PFCRON component in 10.2. Not sure
>>    how to proceed. I also tried patching node C prior to starting it the
>>    standalone state with ./pf-maint.pl and then running the to-10.2.xxx
>>    scripts. I observe the same behavior as above.
>>    2. I'm having a hard time getting Node C's database synced over to
>>    Node A and Node B. Even after stopping mariadb, clearing /var/lib/mysql/*
>>    and starting mariadb again, node A and node B still seem to be hanging 
>> onto
>>    the 10.1.0 database as per 'SELECT * FROM pf_version;' Though node c
>>    indicates the correct schema version when running the above sql query from
>>    the command line.
>>
>>
>> --
>> R. Christian McDonald
>> *Information Technology Manager*
>> Grand Rapids Adventist Academy
>>
>> T: (888) 791-3108 (x1105)
>> O: (616) 791-9797 (x1105)
>> C: (616) 856-9291
>>
>> 1151 Oakleigh Road
>> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/1151+Oakleigh+Road?entry=gmail&source=g>
>> NW
>> Grand Rapids, MI 49504
>> _______________________________________________
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>
> --
> *R. Christian McDonald *
> M: (616) 856-9291
> E: [email protected]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>


-- 
R. Christian McDonald
*Information Technology Manager*
Grand Rapids Adventist Academy

T: (888) 791-3108 (x1105)
O: (616) 791-9797 (x1105)
C: (616) 856-9291

1151 Oakleigh Road NW
Grand Rapids, MI 49504
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to