Hello William, Yes, you can use multiple VLAN in VLAN enforcement mode.
This multi auth relies on a switch feature where it binds a VLAN per Mac address. No need for inline mode there. Thanks, Ludovic Zammit Product Support Engineer Principal Cell: +1.613.670.8432 Akamai Technologies - Inverse 145 Broadway Cambridge, MA 02142 Connect with Us: <https://community.akamai.com/> <http://blogs.akamai.com/> <https://twitter.com/akamai> <http://www.facebook.com/AkamaiTechnologies> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/akamai-technologies> <http://www.youtube.com/user/akamaitechnologies?feature=results_main> > On Apr 27, 2021, at 8:27 AM, Goodspeed, William <william.goodsp...@g3ti.net> > wrote: > > Thanks for the answer Ludovic, I’ll look into that feature. > Would this work with VLAN enforcement though? We have multiple VLANs on these > switches so I was hoping that PF could manage the VLANs on the second switch > like it would on the core switch. If not I think we would have to make the > switch ports be Inline enforcement is that right? > > Thank you, > > William > From: Zammit, Ludovic <luza...@akamai.com> > Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 3:52 PM > To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Cc: Goodspeed, William <william.goodsp...@g3ti.net> > Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Using Managed Switches with VLAN Enforcement > Downstream with Packetfence > > Hello William, > > PacketFence controls switch ports where users are plugged. > > If you want to control a port with a switch on it, Cisco has a mode called > authentication multi-auth that authenticated all the Mac address on the port. > HP/ Aruba has it as well. > > Thanks, > > Ludovic Zammit > Product Support Engineer Principal > > Cell: +1.613.670.8432 > Akamai Technologies - Inverse > 145 Broadway > Cambridge, MA 02142 > Connect with Us: > <https://community.akamai.com/> <http://blogs.akamai.com/> > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://twitter.com/akamai__;!!GjvTz_vk!DOSXuHxsz1neIKR_X40qH7OzIUdWNbWPILZ-nL2AZhFOhnb-W0fEbiAjG37VWw$> > > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.facebook.com/AkamaiTechnologies__;!!GjvTz_vk!DOSXuHxsz1neIKR_X40qH7OzIUdWNbWPILZ-nL2AZhFOhnb-W0fEbiB5GvtQcA$> > > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.linkedin.com/company/akamai-technologies__;!!GjvTz_vk!DOSXuHxsz1neIKR_X40qH7OzIUdWNbWPILZ-nL2AZhFOhnb-W0fEbiCCQpyzig$> > > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.youtube.com/user/akamaitechnologies?feature=results_main__;!!GjvTz_vk!DOSXuHxsz1neIKR_X40qH7OzIUdWNbWPILZ-nL2AZhFOhnb-W0fEbiDTlcCGBQ$> > > > > On Apr 26, 2021, at 8:54 AM, Goodspeed, William via PacketFence-users > <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net > <mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>> wrote: > > Good morning All, > > We are testing Packetfence on a Core switch and have gotten some good > results, but most of our users are connected via managed switches downstream > that then connect to the core. I don’t see any documentation on using managed > switches in between the core and users. Are managed switches supported/able > to have VLANs managed by Packetfence, or would we have to use the inline > enforcement? The switches we currently use are a bit outdated so we would > upgrade if needed if there are models that are known to work with Packetfence. > > Thank you, > > William > _______________________________________________ > PacketFence-users mailing list > PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net > <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users__;!!GjvTz_vk!E_1rha3MmrjRRB5V64Ggmkjjd-d-3n0Ca11dTkYSaELilsbweTWx3gDfp1Ac3UXE$ > > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users__;!!GjvTz_vk!E_1rha3MmrjRRB5V64Ggmkjjd-d-3n0Ca11dTkYSaELilsbweTWx3gDfp1Ac3UXE$>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
