Hello John,

PF does own a dhcp server for the Registration, Isolation and Inline network. 
It’s not easy to add network to handle.

I’m guessing that the network that you want to put in PFDHCP is a production 
network right ?

Thanks,

Ludovic Zammit
Product Support Engineer Principal

Cell: +1.613.670.8432
Akamai Technologies - Inverse
145 Broadway
Cambridge, MA 02142
Connect with Us:         <https://community.akamai.com/>  
<http://blogs.akamai.com/>  <https://twitter.com/akamai>  
<http://www.facebook.com/AkamaiTechnologies>  
<http://www.linkedin.com/company/akamai-technologies>  
<http://www.youtube.com/user/akamaitechnologies?feature=results_main>

> On Nov 4, 2021, at 6:09 PM, John Gammon <john.gam...@forkeddeer.com> wrote:
> 
> Ludovic,
> 
> Thank you for the reply.  I am interested in correcting some of the errors 
> which are prohibiting our advancement in this installation platform.
> 
> I have learned from your input that there is a pfdhcp server instance.  I 
> would like to move my config items from the installed isc-dhcp-server, 
> configuring the pfdhcp server instance.  Is there a direct file for 
> transitioning this information or is there a specific config location (which 
> I have not yet seen in the Installation Guide) for configuring this feature 
> for pf to own and monitor.
> 
> The end goal is for pf to own the dhcp pool and remove the isc-dhcp-server 
> packages I have installed on my server instance.  If this is contained within 
> a document, please point me in that direction.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> John
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: Zammit, Ludovic
> Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2021 15:23
> To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: John Gammon
> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] PF  11.0.0 inquiry
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hello John,
> 
> I will be honest there, using the mailing to achieve that is a bit far fetch 
> because it requires a lot of configuration here and there. Maybe getting a 
> small time bank from Akamai would be better.
> 
> That being said, you could use PacketFence to authenticate user on the 
> network and once they did not pay the bill you unregister them that show the 
> captive portal to register and pay the bill.
> 
> This means that the whole authentication will be managed by PacketFence. 
> Either the Wireless SSID or the switch ports.
> 
> You could also leverage an API call to unregister them from a 3rd party 
> server like the bill system.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ludovic Zammit
> Product Support Engineer Principal
> 
> 
> Cell: +1.613.670.8432
> Akamai Technologies - Inverse
> 145 Broadway
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> 
> Connect with Us:
> 
> 
> On Nov 4, 2021, at 11:46 AM, John Gammon via PacketFence-users 
> <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> I am a newbie attempting config PF 11.0.0 for our purposes.
> 
> Our design is as follows:
> - router handles the VLANs (agnostic to server or end points)
> - domain is pf.forkeddeerconnect.com
> - subnet range for pfdhcp is 147.159.8.0/22
> - entry into the VLAN determined by not paying bill (package management puts 
> user into server)
> - all DNS queries need to redirect to internal httpd index.xhtml webpage for 
> single direction:  PAY YOUR BILL!
>   *  Bill portal address is 208.72.73.60.
>   *  This addr needs to be only address to allow out of this "isolation 
> environment."
> 
> I have the PF server up and functional.  Reached some limitations in getting 
> this moving forward.  I have one device [linux laptop] connected directly to 
> the server for testing.  I have installed isc-dns-bind9 and isc-dhcp-server 
> for address pools and resolution.  But this may be overkill.  I am unsure at 
> this point.
> 
> I do not think authentication of anyone/device is necessary.  If a user ends 
> up in this environment, they are supposed to pay their bill to get out.  I do 
> not believe I need any authentication of hardware, but may be incorrect in my 
> view on this point.  This is a designed isolation environment established to 
> redirect all dns requests to the internal webserver and singular index.xhtml 
> page...and allow them to their manage account portal.
> 
> Any help is welcome.
> 
> R,
> 
> John
> Network Engineer, FDC/FDEC
> john.gam...@forkeddeer.com
> 
> John Gammon
> 
> Network Engineer
> 
> Office   731-903-4282
> 
> john.gam...@forkeddeer.com<mailto:%20john.gam...@forkeddeer.com>
> 
> [fdec logo]
> 
> 1135 North Church Street
> 
> PO Box 67
> 
> Halls, TN 38040
> 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.forkeddeer.com__;!!GjvTz_vk!Cnyx3QHnuE7zdxVoHtkPd2ukjVdh3tPmS2JEXIxYG_OwrzxMd6JxV9pL6P09lk9o$
>  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users__;!!GjvTz_vk!Cnyx3QHnuE7zdxVoHtkPd2ukjVdh3tPmS2JEXIxYG_OwrzxMd6JxV9pL6LJnQb59$
>  

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to