You can only do that with tacacs not with radius. The only thing you can do is to give read/write access to the switch, not define the command you can use.
Le mar. 18 oct. 2022 à 16:33, DeSantos, Matthew via PacketFence-users < packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> a écrit : > I’m also interested in this setup. Does anyone have a working example? > > > > *From:* Mr.Pine via PacketFence-users < > packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > *Sent:* Saturday, October 15, 2022 1:48 AM > *To:* packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net > *Cc:* Mr.Pine <pine5...@gmail.com> > *Subject:* [PacketFence-users] Role-Based CLI Access > > > > *CAUTION:* This email originated from outside of Jordan's. > > > > Hi, > > I want to know if pf can manage Role-Based CLI Access for cisco switch. for > example define what commands are accepted and what configuration > information is visible for users > > Any ideas?! > _______________________________________________ > PacketFence-users mailing list > PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users >
_______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
