What is the version ?

Thanks,

Ludovic Zammit
Product Support Engineer Principal Lead

Cell: +1.613.670.8432
Akamai Technologies - Inverse
145 Broadway
Cambridge, MA 02142
Connect with Us:         <https://community.akamai.com/>  
<http://blogs.akamai.com/>  <https://twitter.com/akamai>  
<http://www.facebook.com/AkamaiTechnologies>  
<http://www.linkedin.com/company/akamai-technologies>  
<http://www.youtube.com/user/akamaitechnologies?feature=results_main>

> On Jun 9, 2025, at 6:17 PM, Enrique Gross <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
> You have not previously corresponded with this sender.
> Hi Ludovic, thanks for your response
> 
> I'm testing with the latest release, and the CoA option is no longer 
> available on the legacy UI. 
> 
> Enrique
> 
> 
> El lun, 9 jun 2025 a las 11:41, Zammit, Ludovic (<[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>) escribió:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Is it still present on the legacy Web ui ?
>> 
>> It used to be present.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Ludovic Zammit
>> Product Support Engineer Principal Lead
>> 
>> Cell: +1.613.670.8432
>> Akamai Technologies - Inverse
>> 145 Broadway
>> Cambridge, MA 02142
>> Connect with Us:      <https://community.akamai.com/>  
>> <http://blogs.akamai.com/>  
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://twitter.com/akamai__;!!GjvTz_vk!QwhR8H8NJv5N2l4zBd-NLQEr9rnUqNoviUVMMZGLexZgGLSagiKIqUk8ADzIdWv-x-bzh--MgirnymphtdR6$>
>>   
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.facebook.com/AkamaiTechnologies__;!!GjvTz_vk!QwhR8H8NJv5N2l4zBd-NLQEr9rnUqNoviUVMMZGLexZgGLSagiKIqUk8ADzIdWv-x-bzh--MgirnyuGwQtFS$>
>>   
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.linkedin.com/company/akamai-technologies__;!!GjvTz_vk!QwhR8H8NJv5N2l4zBd-NLQEr9rnUqNoviUVMMZGLexZgGLSagiKIqUk8ADzIdWv-x-bzh--Mgirnyv4KQ5u8$>
>>   
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.youtube.com/user/akamaitechnologies?feature=results_main__;!!GjvTz_vk!QwhR8H8NJv5N2l4zBd-NLQEr9rnUqNoviUVMMZGLexZgGLSagiKIqUk8ADzIdWv-x-bzh--MgirnytDDk6jU$>
>> 
>>> On Jun 4, 2025, at 12:06 PM, Enrique Gross via PacketFence-users 
>>> <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> This Message Is From an External Sender
>>> This message came from outside your organization.
>>> Anyone?
>>> 
>>> 😟
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> El mié, 21 de may de 2025, 12:30, Enrique Gross <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> escribió:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> 
>>>> Hope you are all doing fine
>>>> 
>>>> I'm hoping to start a discussion with others who are using Packetfence in 
>>>> conjunction with Unifi Access Points.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm currently facing an issue with the newer versions of the Unifi 
>>>> controller software. It appears that the CoA (Change of Authorization) 
>>>> option has been removed and is now only available when using WPA2 
>>>> Enterprise.
>>>> 
>>>> Our current setup involves using Packetfence on WPA2-only networks with 
>>>> MAC authentication and RADIUS-assigned VLANs. We have a BYOD-style network 
>>>> where users connect, and if their MAC address isn't registered, they are 
>>>> directed to PF captive portal. After registering via Google LDAP, they are 
>>>> assigned a VLAN based on their Google group membership. This system has 
>>>> been working very well for us.
>>>> 
>>>> The problem arises because I can no longer update my Unifi controllers. 
>>>> The CoA option, which is essential for us to change authorization after a 
>>>> user registers on the portal, is now restricted to WPA2 Enterprise.
>>>> 
>>>> It seems to me that CoA functionality shouldn't be tied to the wireless 
>>>> security type. I've tried to raise this on the Unifi forums, but it seems 
>>>> I might be the only one experiencing this issue. I understand that Unifi 
>>>> likely won't alter their software for a single user.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm wondering if my understanding is correct – should CoA not be dependent 
>>>> on the wireless security type? Has anyone else encountered this same 
>>>> problem?
>>>> 
>>>> I did experiment with manually adding CoA configurations to text files on 
>>>> the Unifi controller, but I'm concerned this isn't a sustainable solution 
>>>> as it's not the official management method for Unifi access points.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for any insights you might have.
>>>> 
>>>> Enrique
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>> [email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users__;!!GjvTz_vk!WKqD_kGMnYAL8K8JlILvocuKKUwUfRrWWjbMN4Hd4Q4Yvi07_S-peKLbddM2lnF4JMrWSWQmzKO5mz6kUQPPLOWcj6bEXzo7Cv9TEQ$
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> <firma coyo.jpg>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to