Dear list,
We're looking for potential alternatives to our current (commercial,
closed source, black box) NAC solution. PacketFence is a serious
candidate on our list.
I'm considering doing a small pilot. Something that's still unclear to
me, though: is it possible with PacketFence to allow multiple hosts on a
switch port, when using SNMP based Port Security? On some locations, we
allow a certain number of bridged VMs to be active on a host, and on
some locations we allow unmanaged switches on our network with a limited
number of hosts behind them.
I've searched the web and docs a lot; I did find some references that
multiple hosts behind a port is supported in general, but it's still
unclear to me whether this is also true when Port Security is used - and
what's possible in terms of policy in this regard.
Any pointers or experience in this?
Also, if there are people on the list from .NL who would be willing to
share some PacketFence experience: please drop me an e-mail!
Regards,
Jeroen van Ingen, Network Engineer
University of Twente | Library, ICT Services & Archive (LISA)
P.O.Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
Telephone +31 53 489 2526, http://www.utwente.nl/lisa;
room: http://bit.ly/2XUGPKT
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
