Am Montag, 24. Dezember 2007 schrieb Schlomo Schapiro: > Hi, > > upgrading from SuSE 10.3 installed pulseaudio 0.9.6 to PM pulseaudio 0.9.8 > fails because the package layout of the PM packages is different than the > SuSE layout and some SuSE provided tools require the SuSE package which > apparently is not covered by an obsoletes clause in the corresponding PM > package: > > file /usr/lib/libpulse.so.0 from install of libpulse0-0.9.8-0.pm.1 > conflicts with file from package pulseaudio-libs-0.9.6-39 > file /usr/lib/libpulse-browse.so.0 from install of > libpulse-browse0-0.9.8-0.pm.1 conflicts with file from package > pulseaudio-libs-0.9.6-39 > > Can you please fix the PM pulseaudio packages to cleanly install ? no, I won't.
see discussion for topic pulseaudio on our mailinglist in November/December: http://schiffbauer.net/pipermail/packman/2007-November/004841.html http://schiffbauer.net/pipermail/packman/2007-November/004839.html http://schiffbauer.net/pipermail/packman/2007-December/004917.html http://schiffbauer.net/pipermail/packman/2007-December/004918.html and: http://en.opensuse.org/Shared_Library_Packaging_Policy And for your information, these pulseaudio packages in the build-server repository are no officially SuSE-packages, same for the my packman packages. My packages follow the rules of the shared-library policy from SuSE. So feel free to file a bug, for the "wrong" packaged (in sense of the shared library policy from SuSE) pulseaudio packages in the Build-Server repository. > Thanks, > Schlomo have fun Toni _______________________________________________ Packman mailing list [email protected] http://212.112.227.138/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
