Am Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:22:55 +0100 schrieb Christian Herenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Could you maybe explain, why packman provides an vlc package, since > there is a official package in the videolan repo? I'm just curious. Could you explain why videolan provides a52dec, faac, faad2, ffmpeg, lame, libdca, libdts, libdvdpsi5, mad .......... which often are not compatible with packman-repo? This packages are on packman since years and we couldn't delete them, because many other pm-packages need this stuff. Videolan could build on packman as an official repo, it would be easier for the people... Detlef _______________________________________________ Packman mailing list [email protected] http://212.112.227.138/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
