Hi, On Thursday, October 02, 2008 at 14:53:01, Toni wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2008 schrieb Henne Vogelsang: > > On Thursday, October 02, 2008 at 08:05:24, Toni wrote: > > > > liboil0 seem to miss the usual Provides|Obsoletes: liboil lines. > > > > > > NO, won't be fixed. > > > > > > file a bug against the SuSE package, it is NOT following the SuSE-shared > > > library policy > > > > For released product you can file all bugs you want. We cant change the > > name in our build trees. Whats the problem with obsoleting liboil from > > your liboil0? > > I inserted already the obsolte statements for the actual liboil from the > SuSE-DVD/base repo but evertime someone is rebuilding the liboil without > regarding the policy in the buildserver I should follow ?
We can't help people with buildservice repositories can we? We always stated that our policy is openSUSE + packman and not openSUSE + packman + X. So take care of the Obsoletes for the the openSUSE package and ignore the rest is my suggestion. Henne -- Henne Vogelsang, http://hennevogel.de "To die. In the rain. Alone." Ernest Hemingway _______________________________________________ Packman mailing list [email protected] http://212.112.227.138/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
