Am Mittwoch, 25. November 2009 schrieb Adrian Schröter: > Am Mittwoch, 25. November 2009 09:05:39 schrieb Toni: > > Am Mittwoch, 25. November 2009 schrieb Adrian Schröter: > > > Hi Tongra and others, > > > > > > thanks a lot for your work on the fpc package. I copied it into the > > > devel:languages:pascal project of build.opensuse.org to get it working > > > again (and up to date). > > > > sometimes it is a messy package, but the fedora people are often faster > > and have the needed patches and/or workarounds ... > > Okay, there was a guy in IRC called "dbuck" who had also interesst in > maintaining this package btw. Dunno about his abilities. > > > > Pascal suggest that we may should maintain it in build.opensuse.org and > > > just create a source link in main project of packman build service. > > > > > > I would add you as maintainer in the devel:languages:pascal project in > > > that case. > > > > > > What is your opinion about that ? > > > > I need this fpc / lazarus packages for a handful of packman packages > > (cactusjukebox, dargui, easymp3gain, peazip, scrabble, winff, gearhead2, > > hedgewars). Those programs needs mostly the actual stable versions of fpc > > and lazarus, so it should be possible to move this package to OBS. > > Okay, you could just create a _link file in your packaman package pointing > to project="openSUSE.org:devel:languages:pascal" package="fpc". > > So you have always the lasted source building in packman. > > And if you tell me your user account in build.opensuse.org, I will add you > to the project there, so you could directly work there. my user account should be oc2pus, but I never used it since I joined the packman team.
> > > Are there other packages where such a setup would make sense ? > > > > lazarus, the IDE for fpc would than make sense too so lazarus will move too ? > > Other develpment tools like llvm and jam are also candidates. <snip> > > This leads to the question, why not linking parts of the > > packman-repsitory to build.opensuse.org ? > > This is a policy and legal question. By policy we defined our instance as > root, so we don't create projects with remote instances (or using the DoD > feature) there at all. > > On the legal side we would have special problems with the packman instance > I think. :) we are not the "bad" boys .... > > bye > adrian -- have fun Toni _______________________________________________ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman