On 2010-11-24 15:03:32 (+0100), Manfred Hollstein <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, 01:09:40 +0100, rlee wrote: > > There was a long discussion on the legality of libfaac it turned out that > > Packman could not keep its version of libfaac so it was switched off. The > > discussion was about ffmpeg. You'll find it under that subject in the > > archives, the date for the thread was around Nov 16. > > thanks for the reply. I've now looked at the thread and fully understand > that the package has been pulled and appreciate re-configuring/-building > packages like ffmpeg to not rely on libfaac, but, as MPlayer and avidemux, > at least, also require "libfaac.so.0", I hope similar tidying will be > done for such packages, too. Does anybody know, if so and when?
Which mirror are you using for the Packman repository ? As rlee pointed out, faac support has indeed been removed from ffmpeg, but the faac/libfaac packages are still built and published. I just checked on our primary server and the RPM packages are there indeed. Smells like something is fishy with the mirror (or the repository metadata). cheers -- -o) Pascal Bleser <[email protected]> /\\ http://opensuse.org -- I took the green pill _\_v FOSDEM XI: 5 + 6 Feb 2011, http://fosdem.org
pgpYumij0t2wQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Packman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
