On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 09:28 -0600, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 23:50 +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote: > > 2011/2/3 James Bottomley <[email protected]>: > > >> The package is built with the codecs support in the > > >> home:RedDwarf:multimedia repo (still I would like to see it in > > >> Packman), to easily test. > > >> The spec file > > >> (https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file?project=GNOME:Factory&package=opal&file=opal.spec) > > >> explains everything using the format from > > >> http://old-en.opensuse.org/Packaging/Patches, upstream bug reports > > >> included. > > > > > > OK, I can pretty much use that one then. > > > > That package doesn't splits "opal-nonfree-codecs" in its own package. > > So it would be great if you could send that, and any other > > improvement, from your package to the GNOME:Factory one. After that > > Packman should still link the package since home:RedDwarf:multimedia > > is little more than a hack and what users really use is Packman. > > After a little more research, I got a preliminary H.264 patch that fixes > the blockiness and time delay ... I still have a problem with the frame > rate, which is way too low, but I think it's sufficient to make the > codec usable. I've bundled up the patch and added it to > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=596006 so we'll see if they > take it. > > Next step will be to analyse exactly what Gnome:Factory has done and see > if I can make the package split work.
It's all done and dusted and here: https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=home%3Ajejb1%3AVideoConf James _______________________________________________ Packman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
