Am Samstag, 26. Februar 2011 schrieb todd rme: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Manfred Tremmel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Am Freitag, 25. Februar 2011 schrieb Pascal Bleser: > >> On 2011-02-25 22:17:47 (+0100), Manfred Tremmel > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > I think 99% of the users will never use a videoplayer with caca- > >> > textoutput on console. For myselve I've done it a view times for > >> > testing, but for nothing else. It's not realy usefull. So it's > >> > completely unimportend even if we would build the mediaplayers > >> > on opneSUSE 11.1 and SLES without caca. > >> > >> Hmmmmmmm... that's very true actually... > >> So, would you be fine if I disable building libcaca for 11.1 and > >> SLE_11 as well ? (and build MPlayer, vlc, ... without libcaca > >> support on those) > > > > I wouldn't do this. This would cause a lot of spec-file changes. > > > > -- > > Machs gut | http://www.iivs.de/schwinde/buerger/tremmel/ > > > > Manfred | http://packman.links2linux.de/ > > How many packages depend on this? It is just 3 lines that can be > copied and pasted between each spec file that has a direct > buildrequires. Unless there are a ton of packages that explicitly > depend on this it wouldn't be that hard.
It's not as simple. It's not only a "%if %suse_version >= 1120" and "%endif" to put arround the "BuildRequires: libcaca-devel". There are filelists to change and package descriptions (like in xine-lib). I think this is a waist of the limited time we have. And all this for a package (libcaca) we do have for a long time on the server and we know it makes no problem on a openSUSE 11.1. -- Machs gut | http://www.iivs.de/schwinde/buerger/tremmel/ Manfred | http://packman.links2linux.de/ _______________________________________________ Packman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
