2011/3/5 Pascal Bleser <[email protected]>: > On 2011-03-05 09:12:42 (+0100), Cristian Morales Vega <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Why should it be in Multimedia? It's in Essentials: >> http://packman.jacobs-university.de/suse/openSUSE_11.3/Essentials/x86_64/ >> In fact... why should it be in Packman? openSUSE already comes with >> libsndfile 1.0.20. > > Yes, indeed, except Evergreen_11.1 and SLE_11. > Right now, in Essentials, it's a _link to multimedia:libs on > OBS. > > It's a bit sensitive because a lot of packages depend on it: > MPlayer > bs2b > fluidsynth > gstreamer010-bml > gstreamer010-buzztard > gstreamer010-plugins-bad > gstreamer010-plugins-bad-0.10.19 > gstreamer010-plugins-good > gstreamer010-plugins-good-0.10.24 > k3b > ladspa-pvoc > lame > libbluray > libcaca > libquicktime > mpg123 > openal-soft > phonon-backend-vlc > projectM-pulseaudio > smplayer > taglib-extras > twolaame > vlc > xine-lib > > I'd say that, right now, it's too sensitive to muck around with > it but yeah, there is most probably no need for it to be in > Essentials (except maybe for Evergreen and SLE). Would have to > check whether multimedia:libs/libsndfile differs from the > package that ships with openSUSE in any way. > TBH it's not on the top of my TODO list right now, but thanks > for noticing :)
I'm going to try to at least clean openSUSE:11.4. The openSUSE:11.4 and multimedia:libs versions of libsndfile are bit identical, so it's safe. If at some point a package requires a newer version of libsndfile than the one found in openSUSE 11.4 it would be good that whoever enables the build adds in the OBS package description a comment explaining why it's enabled (see cdparanoia and schroedinger descriptions). This way there would be some control about this kind of packages. _______________________________________________ Packman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
