On Tuesday, April 05, 2011 06:54:59 PM todd rme wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:43 AM, İsmail Dönmez <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tuesday, April 05, 2011 05:42:35 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >> > but I won't discuss this anymore. Other distributions already > >> > switched to libav and it only made sense for Packman to do so too. > >> > >> So in summary, because 1 person who maintains both debian & ubuntu > >> packages of ffmpeg and who is a libav developer switched the packages > >> he makes over to his fork that he is a member of. everyone else > >> switches too? > > > > Its your chance to show us that, we are wrong. You are a good leader and > > FFmpeg is actually better than libav. > > > > Regards. > > I don't think most users care about all this political stuff. The > question is: which currently is more stable and more feature-complete? > Several people now have said that ffmpeg is. So far I have not seen > any of the people here promoting libav disagree with that conclusion.
Michael ATM just does blind merges and reverts them later on, I wouldn't call that the most stable thing. He is just trying to make use of libav developers' free work. Regards. -- İsmail Dönmez - openSUSE Booster SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany _______________________________________________ Packman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
